LING TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 23.01.2021
Home Archive 2017 Year Issue №4 SEMATIC INTERPRETATION PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTIONS WITH POSSESSIVE FORMANTS IN THE DIALECTS OF SELKUP
  • Home
  • Archive
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Submit paper
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru

EBSCO

Яндекс.Метрика
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

SEMATIC INTERPRETATION PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTIONS WITH POSSESSIVE FORMANTS IN THE DIALECTS OF SELKUP

Kim-Maloney A. A., Kovylin S. V.

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2017-4-29-41

Information About Author:

Kim A. A., Doctor filol. nauk, professor. Tomsk State Pedagogical University. Ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russia, 634061. National Research Tomsk State University. Pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, 634050. E-mail: alexandrakim@hotmail.com Kovylin S. V., Junior research fellow. National Research Tomsk State University. Pr. Lenina, 36, Tomsk, 634050. E-mail: kovylin.ser@yandex.ru

The semantics of Selkup constructions with possessive formants, which are possessive suffixes and the suffix of the Genitive Case, combines possessive and non-possessive relationships. The semantic types of possessiveness, denoted by L. Stassen, namely, alienable, inalienable, abstract and temporary physical possession, are characteristic of most predicative and nominal constructions, although this study revealed limitations of their semantic realization: (i) predicative transitive constructions with the verb to hold are used only to express alienable or temporary physical possession; (ii) the semantics of temporary physical possession occurs only in predicative constructions; (iii) inalienable possession is associated with the names of relatives, parts and functions of the body, and personal items; (iv) possessive suffixes are also used in non- possessive function to convey anaphora and deixis in a specific context; they are also used to express unique phenomena.

Keywords: the selkup language, semantics of constructions with possessive formants

References:

Arhiv LYANS. TGPU. Selkupy (S – Tom): 23, 34, 36, 42, 56, 60, 61, 66 [Archive LLPS. TSPU. Selkupy. (C – Volume)] – Tomsk. (in Russian)

Artemova O. A. Dejksis i anafora kak ukazatelnye sredstva yazyka universalnoe i unikalnoe [Dexis and Anafora as Indexing Means of the Language: Universal and Unique] // Idei. Poiski. Resheniya: sbornik statej i tezisov X Mezhdunar. nauch. prakt. konf., Minsk, 23 November 2016 g. V 6 chastyah. Chast 2. – Mn.: BGU, 2017. – P. 6–10. (in Russian)

Erdély I. Selkupisched Wörterverzeichnis. Tas-Dialekt. – Akadémiai Kiadó Budapest. Hungary 1969.

Glushkov S. V., Baydak A. V., Maksimova N. P. Dialektyi selkupskogo yazyika [Dialects of The Selkup Language]. // Selkupyi: Ocherki traditsionnoy kulturyi i selkupskogo yazyika: monografiya. Tomskiy politehnicheskiy universitet; 2-e izd. ispr. i dop. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 2013. – P. 49–63. (in Russian)

Grigorovski N. P. Obyasnenie prazdnikov Sv. Tserkvi. Na ostyatsko-samoedskom yazyke [The Explanation of the Holy Church Holidays. On the Ostyak-Samoedic Hanguage] / Sost. N. P. Grigorovskim dlya inorodtsev Narymskogo kraya. – Kazan, 1879a. (in Russian)

Grigorovski N. P. Svyashchennaya istoriya. Na ostyatsko-samoedskom yazyke [Sacret History. On the Ostyak-Samoedic Language] / Sost. N. P. Grigorovskim dlya inorodtsev Narymskogo kraya. – Kazan, 1879b. (in Russian)

Heine B. Possession. Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 83. – Cambridge University Press, 1997. – 274 p.

Kim A. A. O svyazi kategorii prityazhatelnosti s kategoriej opredelennosti v selkupskom yazyke [On the Connection of the Category of Possession with the Category of Definiteness in the Selkup Language] // Yazyki i toponimiya. Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 7. – Tomsk, 1980. – P. 100–106. (in Russian)

Kim A. A. Semanticheskie osnovy sochetaemosti lichno-prityazhatelnyh suffiksov s imenami sushchestvitelnymi v selkupskom yazyke [Semantic Compatibility Basis of Possessive Suffixes with Nouns in the Selkup Language] // Teoreticheskie voprosy fonetiki grammatiki yazykov narodov USSR. – Novosibirsk, 1981a. – P. 74–83. (in Russian)

Kim A. A. Habeo-konstruktsii v selkupskom yazyke [Habeo-Constructions in the Selkup Language] // Yazyki i toponimiya. Sb. nauch. tr. – Tomsk, 1981b. – P. 90–94. (in Russian)

Kim A. A. Vyrazhenie kategorii prityazhatelnosti v dialektah selkupskogo yazyka [Expression of Possessive Means in Selkup Dalects]: dis ... kand. filol. nauk. – Tomsk, 1986. – 205 p. (in Russian)

Kim-Maloni A. A., Kovylin S. V. Taksonomiya yazyikovyih sredstv vyrazheniya posessivnosti v selkupskom yazyke [Taxonomy of Possessive Language Means in Selkup] // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2015. – № 4 (10). – P. 36–44. (in Russian)

Kim-Maloni A. A., Kovylin S. V. Strategii formirovaniya predikativnoj posessivnosti v selkupskih dialektah [Strategies of the Predicative Possession Formation in the Selkup Dialects] // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2016. – № 4 (14). – P. 9–21. (in Russian)

Kuzmina A. I. K ehtimologiyam nazvanij mesyatsev, storon sveta, zvezd i sozvezdij v selkupskom yazyke [On the Name Etymologies of Months, Points of the compass, Stars and Constellations in the Selkup Language] // Yazyki i toponimiya. – Tomsk, 1977. – P. 71–85. (in Russian)

Kuznetsova A. I., Kazakevich O. A., Ioffe L. Ju, Helimskiy E. A. Ocherki po selkupskomu yazyku. Tazovskij dialect. Uchebnoe posobie [Sketches of the Selkup Language. Taz Dialect. Training Manual]. – M.: Izdatelstvo MGU, 1993. – 196 s. (in Russian)

Kuznetsova A. I., Helimskiy E. A., Grushkina E. V. Ocherki po selkupskomu yazyiku. Tazovskiy dialekt. Tom 1 [Sketches of the Selkup Language. Taz Dialect. Vol. 1]. – M.: Izdatelstvo MGU, 1980. – 411 p. (in Russian)

Lehtisalo T. Samojedische Sprachmaterialien. Gesammelt von M. A. Castren und T. Lehtisalo. – Helsinki, 1960.

Nikolaeva I. Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic // In: Bernard Comrie and Pirkko Suihkonen (eds.), International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantification. Izhevsk, 2003. URL: http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/nikolaeva/papers/izhevsk.pdf (Accessed: 09 November 2017).

Stassen L. Predicative Possession. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistics. – Oxford University Press, 2009. – 812 p.

Zhurinskaya M. A. Imennye posessivnye konstruktsii i problema neottorzhimoj prinadlezhnosti [Nominal Possessive Constructions and the Problem of Inalienable Possessivity] // Kategoriya yazyka i obladaniya v yazyke. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – P. 194–157. (in Russian)

kim-malony_a._a._29_41_4_18_2017.pdf ( 800.22 kB ) kim-malony_a._a._29_41_4_18_2017.zip ( 784.53 kB )

Issue: 4, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: LINGUISTICS

Pages: 29 — 41

Downloads: 420

© 2021 Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU