POSSESSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN EASTERN KHANTY
The paper reviews possession in the eastern-most Khanty dialects with less than half a dozen speakers remaining. The analysis stems from extended fieldwork data and legacy data archived at Tomsk Department of Indigenous Languages of Siberia. The main purpose is to discuss the key morphosyntactic and semantic features of possession based on available data and approached within a conventional theoretical and methodological framework. This will allow integration of the data and analysis into the debates regarding possession from the areal Siberian, genetic Uralic and wider typological perspective.
Keywords: possession, Khanty, typology, Siberia
References:
1. Bartens, Raija. 1991. Die positive und negative Existentiale in den fi nnisch-ugrischen Sprache // Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. Neue Folge 14, pp. 58–97.
2. Bubrikh, D. V. 1955. Istoricesakaja morfologija fi nskogo jazyka. Moscow-Leningrad. Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.
3. Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17, 79–106.
4. Décsy, Gyula. 1965. Einführung in die Finnisch-Ugrische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz
5. Filchenko, Andrey. 2007. Aspects of the Grammar of Eastern Khanty. Tomsk: TSPU Press.
6. Filchenko, Andreу. 2012. Continuity of information structuring strategies in Eastern Khanty: defi niteness/topicality. In: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie, Valerij Soloviev (eds). Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 115–133.
7. Filchenko, Andrey. 2012. Negation in Eastern Khanty. TSPU Bulletin, no. 1 (116), pp. 38–45.
8. Fichenko, Andrey. 2013. Asymmetric Negation in Eastern Khanty and Southern Selkup. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics & Anthropology, no. 2 (2), Tomsk: TSPU-Press, pp. 29–50.
9. Filchenko, Andrey. forthcoming. Negation in Eastern Khanty. In: Negation in Uralic Languages. M. Miestamo, B. Wagner-Nagy, A. Tamm (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (in the press).
10. Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction. V–I & V–II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11. Gulya, János. 1966. Eastern ostyak chrestomathy. Bloomington. Indiana University Press.
12. Honti, László. 1984. Chrestomathia ostiacica. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.
13. Honti, László 2007: A birtoklás kifejezésének eszközei az uráli nyelvekben szinkrón és diakrón szempontból // Nyelvtudományi Közlemények.no. 104, pp. 7–56.
14. Kangasmaa-Minn, Eeva 1984. On the Possessive Construction in Finno-Ugric // Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, no. 86, pp. 118–123.
15. Lambrecht, Knut. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Nikolaeva, Irina. 1999. Ostyak. Mü nchen; Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
17. Payne, Doris L., I. Barshi. 1999. External Possession: what, where, how, and why. In: External possession. D. L. Payne, I. Barshi (eds). Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 3–29.
18. Tereškin, Nikolaj. 1961. Očerki dialektov hantyjskogo jazyka: Vahovskij dialekt. [Review of Khanty Dialects: Vakh Dialect] L.: Nauka.
19. Tereškin, Nikolaj. 1981. Slovar vostočno-hantyjskix dialektov. [Dictionary of Eastern Khanty Dialects] L.: Nauka.
20. Serebrennikov, B. A. 1964. Osnovnie linii razvitija padezhnoj i glagolnoj system v uralskikh jazykax. Moscow, Nauka.
( 643.46 kB ) 
( 634.61 kB )
Issue: 1, 2014
Series of issue: Issue № 1
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 83 — 95
Downloads: 1203