INTONATION UNIVERSALS AND PROSODY OF UTTERANCES OF THE TELEUT LANGUAGE
The intonation of the Teleut utterances is under consideration in this work: Кижи эзенjит. – ‘The man thinks’. – [kɨӡɨ εzεnjɨt]Салқын қаақjит. – ‘The wind blows’. – [salkъn qa:qjɨt], Кижи эзенjит пa? – ‘Does the man think?’ – [kɨӡɨ εzεnjɨt pa], Салқын қаақjит пa? – ‘Does the wind blow?’ – [salkъn qa:qjɨt pa], Неденааре кижи эзентит? – ‘What does the man think about?’ – [nεdεna:rε kɨӡɨ εzεnjɨt], Каани салкын каақтит? – ‘Where does the wind blow?’ – [ka:nI salkъn ka:qjɨt], which were pronounced by 10 Teleut speakers, who live in the village Bekovo, Belovo district, Kemerovo region. We analyzed the phrases by help of computer programs Speech Analyzer 3.01 and Wave Assistant using audiovisual method and relying on speaker’s perception.
Keywords: Turk languages, the Teleut language, intonation, speech prosody, linguistic universals, speech perception
References:
Baichura U. Sh. Zvukovoj stroj tatarskogo yazyka v svyazy s nekotorymy drugimy tyurkskimy i fi nno-ugorskimy yazykamy. Abstract of thesis dis. dokt. of fi lol. sci. [Phonetics of Tatar in comparison with other Turkic and Finno-Ugric languages. Abstract of doctoral dissertation]. Moscow, 1962 (in Russian).
Bicheldej K. N. Leksiko-grammaticheskie i ritmomelodicheskie sredstva vyrazhenia voprositelnosty v khakasskom yazyke [Lexico-grammatical and rythmmelodical features of coding the interrogative senses in Khakass]. Moscow, 2001 (in Russsian).
Bondarko L. V. Fonetika sovremennogo russkofo yazyka [Phonetics of modern Russian]. Saint Petersburg, 1998 (in Russian).
Gertsog O. F. Ritmomelodika sobstvenno-povestvovatelnyh predlozhenij telengitskogo dialekta altaiskogo yazyka //
Foneticheskie struktury v sibirskih yazykah. [Rithmmelodics of indicative affi rmative sentences of the Telengit dialect of Altai language]. Novosibirsk, 1986 (in Russian).
Nikolaeva T. M. Frazovaja intonatsia slavyanskih yazykov [Phrasal intonation in Slavic languages]. Moscow, 1977 (in Russian).
Ryasyanen M. Materialy po istoricheskoj fonetike tyurkskih yazykov [Materials on historical phonetics of Turkic languages]. Moscow, 1955 (in Russian).
Filchenko A. U. Prosodika i pragmatika vostochno-hantyiskih narrativov [Prosody and pragmatics in Eastern Khanty narratives]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2011, no. 9 (111), pp. 139–145 (in Russian).
Chen A. Universal and language-specifi c perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. URL: http://www.lotpublications.nl/publish/articles/001170/bookpart.pdf (Accessed: 27 March 2013).
Haan J., van Heuven V., Pacilly J., van Bezooijen R. Intonational characteristics of declarativity and interrogativity in Dutch: a comparison. Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications. Athens, 1997.
Hirst D., Cristo A. di. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge, 1998.
Fujisaki H. The Interplay between Physiology, Physics and Phonetics in the Production of Tonal Features of Speech of Various Languages (model for the processing of fundamental frequency control of speech) (Invited Paper), Proceedings of 10th Internatioanl Conference on Speech and Computer, Patras, Greece (October 2005).
Fujisaki H. Production and perception of statement, question and non-terminal intonation in German. ICPhS, 1995, vol. 2.
Ladd R. Evidence for the independent function of intonation contour type, voice quality, and F0 range in signaling speaker affect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78(2), August 1985.
O’Connor J. D., Arnold G. F. Intonation of Colloquial English. London, 1973.
Pierrehumbert J. The perception of fundamental frequency declination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66 (2), August 1979.
Thorsen N. A study of the perception of sentence intonation – evidence from Danish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67 (3), March, 1980.
Toivanen J. H. Perspectives on intonation: English, Finish and English spoken by fi nns. Oulu, 1999.
Issue: 3, 2014
Series of issue: Issue № 1
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 49 — 56
Downloads: 1124