SYNTAX OF A CAUSATIVE CONSTRUCTION IN THE NENETS LANGUAGES

Stenin Ivan Andreyevich

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2017-1-25-35

Information About Author:

Stenin I. A. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Ul. Staraya Basmannaya, 21/4, building 1, Moscow, Russia, 105066. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Leninskie Gory, 1, build. 51, Moscow, Russia, 119991. E-mail: ystein88@gmail.com

The paper concerns argument structure of causative verbs in Tundra Nenets and Forest Nenets. Special attention is paid to marking of the initial subject of a non-causative construction. Changing of syntactic status of predicate’s arguments in course of causativization meets expectations and conforms to B. Comrie’s generalization known as “paradigm case”. According to it, the causee (initial subject) is demoted to the highest free position at the grammatical relations hierarchy. The basic ingestive verb (‘eat’) is of interest because it is transitive in the Nenets languages and does not admit omission of its direct object. However, it is causativized as if it were intransitive. Short comments on syntax of an analytic causative construction are also made.

Keywords: Tundra Nenets, Forest Nenets, causative, argument structure, ingestive verbs

References:

Alpatov V. M., Arkadiev P. M., Podlesskaja V. I. 2008. Teoreticheskaja grammatika japonskogo jazyka [Theoretical grammar of Japanese]. (In 2 vol. Vol. 2.) Moscow: Natalis.

Tatevosov S. G. 2010. Akcional’nost’ v leksike i grammatike [Actionality in lexicon and grammar]. Doctor of Sciences dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State University.

Tereshchenko N. M. 1965. Nenecko-russkij slovar’ [Nenets-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: Nauka.

Chujkova O. Yu. 2016. “Ingestivnye” glagoly v russkom jazyke: nekotorye nabljudenija [“Ingestive” verbs in Russian: some observations] // Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies. Vol. XII, part 1. Issledovanija po tipologii i grammatike [Studies on typology and grammar] / ed. by D. V. Gerasimov. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 251–263.

Aikhenvald A. Y. 2009. ‘Eating’, ‘drinking’ and ‘smoking’: A generic verb and its semantics in Manambu // J. Newman (ed.). The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 91–108.

Amberber M. 2009. Quirky alternations of transitivity: The case of ingestive predicates // J. Newman (ed.). The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 45–63.

Arkadiev P. M., Pakerys J. 2015. Lithuanian morphological causatives: A corpus-based study // A. Holvoet, N. Nau (eds.). Voice and argument structure in Baltic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–98.

Comrie B. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences // M. Shibatani (ed.). The grammar of causative constructions. New York: Academic Press, 261–312.

Dixon R. M. W. 2000. A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning // R. M. W. Dixon, A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–83.

Kittilä S. 2009. Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices // Folia Linguistica 43(1), 67–94.

Masica C. P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Nedjalkov V. P., Otaina G. A. 2013. A syntax of the Nivkh language: The Amur dialect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nikolaeva I. 2014. A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

Næss Å. 2007. Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Næss Å. 2009. How transitive are EAT and DRINK verbs? // J. Newman (ed.). The linguistics of eating and drinking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–43.

Saksena A. 1980. The affected agent // Language 56(4), 812–826.

Tsujimura N. 1996. An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

( 786.41 kB ) ( 771.69 kB )

Issue: 1, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 1

Rubric: LINGUISTICS

Pages: 25 — 35

Downloads: 1174