HYPOTHESIS OF DINLIN-YENISSEIC UNITY
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2017-1-9-24
In the proposed paper the author makes another come-back to the issue of Kets origin or, wider – Yenisseic people, the questions that was addressed to themselves by the XVIII century scholars and which is being asked by the XXI century scholars, there are many anticipations, but the Kets are still a mystery, nevertheless, we, of course know more about them nowadays, than the past centuries scholars. Especially we enriched our knowledge on them beginning from the second half of the XX century, mostly like due to works of outstanding scientists E. A. Alekseenko, A. P. Dulzon and E. A. Kreinovitch. The main interesting regarding their ancient genetic relations currently seem to be Sino-Tibetan and Dene-Yenisseic hypothesis, based on linguistic data. In the proposed article there is no a set task on critical analysis of the hypothesis on remote genetic relationship of Yenisseic people, the author would like to go to the question of the latter predecessors of Ket-Yenisseic people among early peoples of Central Asia and consider their possible ethnographic roots within those peoples. The level of working out of the Ket and other Yenisseic peoples’ problem currently allows only to outline different anticipations, regarding this point, the article is not different from other ones, but it attempts to allocate the abovementioned problem to the recorded historical events before BC and first centuries of CE, and also correlate it to peoples-participants of those events, particularly with Dinlins, Hunns and Hunnas. So that there is an attempt to estimate historiographic, ethnographic and linguistic material related to Yenisseic peoples’ problem to define their place, their participation and role in registered and possible to be reconstructed historical events in correspondent geographical areas.
Keywords: Yenisseic people’s origin, Ligeti–Palliblank hypothesis, Hunn–Yenisseic language relations
References:
Altheim F. Geschichte der Hunnen. – Bd. 1, 2. Aufl. – Berlin, 1969 (1. Aufl. 1959).
Aristov N. A. Zametki ob jetnicheskom sostave tjurkskih plemen i narodnostej [Notes on ethnic composition of Turkic tribes and peoples]. – Sankt-Petersburg, 1897. (in Russian)
Artamonov M. I. Istorija hazar [Khazars’ history]. – L., 1962. (in Russian)
Barthold W. 12 Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Türken Mittelasiens. – Berlin, 1935.
Bartol'd V. V. Sochinenija [Works]., – M., 1963. – Vol. II, part 1. (in Russian)
Baskakov N. A. Altajskaja sem'ja jazykov i ee izuchenie [Altaic language family and its study]. – M., 1981. (in Russian)
Bazin L. Un texte proto-turc de 4e siècle. – Oriens 1. – Р. 208–219.
Bengtson Jh. D. Notes on Sino-Caucasian. – Dene-Sino-Caucasian Languages. Brockmeyer Verlag, Bochum, 1991. – Р. 67–129.
Bernshtam A. N. Ocherk istorii gunnov [A note on Hunns’ history]. – L., 1951. (in Russian)
Blažek V., Bengtson Jh. D. Lexica Dene-Caucasica // Central Asiatic Journal. – 1995. – Vol. 39/1. – P. 11–50.
Chavannes E. Les pays d’Occident d’après le Wei-lio // T’oung Pao. – 1905. – Sèrie 2, vol. VI. – P. 519–571.
Décsy G. Einführung in die finnisch-ugrische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1965.
Doerfer G. Zur Sprache der Hunnen // Central Asiatic Journal. – 1973. – Vol. XVII. – S. 1–50.
Donner K. (1916-1920): Beiträge zur Frage nach dem Ursprung der Jenissei-Ostjaken // Journal de la Société Finnoougrienne. –1916–1920. – Vol. 37. – S. 1–21.
Dul'zon A. P. Drevnie peredvizhenija ketov po dannym toponimiki // Izvestija Vsesojuznogo geograficheskogo obshhestva [Ancient migrations of Ket as per toponymic data]. – L., 1962. – Vol. 94. – P. 474–482. (in Russian)
Dul'zon A. P. Jetnicheskij sostav drevnego naselenija Sibiri po dannym toponimiki // Trudy XXV Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa vostokovedov [Ethnical composition of ancient population of Siberia based on toponymic data]. – M.: Izd-vo Vostochnoj Literatury, 1963. – P. 289–295. (in Russian)
Dul'zon A. P. Ketskie toponimy Zapadnoj Sibiri // Uchenye zapiski Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta [Ket toponyms of West Siberia // Scientific papers of Tomsk state teachers training institute]. – Tomsk, 1959. – Vol. XVIII. – P. 91–111. (in Russian)
Futaky I. Tungusische Lehnwörter des Ostjakischen // Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 10. – Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 1975.
Gabain A. von. Rewiew of Louis Bazin „Un texte proto-turc de 4e siècle“ // Der Islam. – 1949. – Vol. 20. – S. 244–246.
Gadzhieva N. Z. Tjurkskie jazyki // Lingvisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar'. “Sovetskaja jenciklopedija” [Turkic languages // Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. “Soviet encyclopedia”]. – M., 1990. – P. 527–528. (in Russian)
Gohman I. I. Antropologija ketov // Ketskij sbornik. Antropologija, jetnografija, mifologija, lingvistika [Kets’ anthropology // Ket compilation. Anthropology, ethnography, mythology, lingustics]. – L., 1982. – P. 7–83. (in Russian)
Grumm-Grzhimajlo, Grigorij E. Belokuraja rasa V Srednej Azii // Russkoe geograficheskoe obshhestvo (zapadnoe otdelenie) [White race in Middle Asia // Russian geographic society (western branch)]. – 1909. – Vol. 34. – P. 163–188 (see the same in V.: Gumilev L. N. 1997/1. – С. 340–360). (in Russian)
Gumilev L. N. Sochinenija. – T. 9–10 // Istorija naroda Hunnu, 1–2 [Works. – Vol. 9–10 [Hunnu people’s history]. – M.: Institut DI-DIK, 1997. (in Russian)
Hajdu P. Die ältesten Berührungen zwischen den Samojeden und den jenisseischen Völkern // Acta Orientalia. – 1953. – Vol. 3. – S. 73–101.
Hudjakov Ju. S. Problemy istorii drevnih kyrgyzov (pervonachal'noe rasselenie) // Jetnograficheskoe obozrenie [Problems of ancient Kyrgyz people’s history (initial settlement) // Ethnographic review]. – 2001. – № 5. – P. 12–16. (in Russian)
Inostrancev K. A. Hunny i gunny (2-e dop. izd.) // Trudy tjurkologicheskogo seminarija [Hunns and Hunnus (2nd ed.) // works of Turkological seminar]. – № 13/I. – L., 1926. (in Russian)
Kljashtornyj S. G. Formirovanie drevnetjurkskoj gosudarstvennosti: ot plemennogo sojuza do Tjurkskogo kaganata [Formation of ancient Turkic statement: form tribes union to Turkic kaganat], 1997. (in Russian)
Kyzlasov L. P. K voprosu ob jetnogeneze hakasov // Uchenye zapiski Hakasskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta jazyka, literatury i istorii [To ethnical genesis of Khakas people]. – Abakan, 1959. – Vol. VII. – P. 70–92. (in Russian)
Ligeti L. Mots de la civilization de Haute Asie an transcription Chinoise // Acta Orientalia Hungarica. – Vol. 1950/1. – S. 141–188.
Luvsandjendjev A. Sjan'vijskij jazyk // Jazyki mira. Mongol'skie jazyki. Tunguso-man'chzhurskie jazyki. Japonskij jazyk. Korejskij jazyk [Syanvin language // Languages of the world. Mongolian languages. Tunguso-Manchzhur languages. Japanese language. Korean language]. – M., 1997. – С. 144–147. (in Russian)
L'vova E. L. Oktjabr'skaja I. V., Sagalaev A. M., Usmanova M. S. Tradicionnoe mirovozzrenie tjurkov Juzhnoj Sibiri. Prostranstvo i vremja. Veshhnyj mir [Traditional world outlook of South Siberian Turks. Space and time. Things’ world]. – Novosibirsk, 1988. (in Russian)
Lytkin V. I., Majtinskaja K. E., Redei K. (red.) Osnovy finno-ugorskogo jazykoznanija [Basics of finno-ugric studies]. – M., 1974 (1); 1975 (2); 1976 (3). (in Russian)
Maenchen-Helfen O. The Huns and the Hsiung-nu // Bizantion. American Series III, T. XVII. – 1945. – P. 222–243.
Maloletko A. M. Drevnie narody Sibiri. Jetnicheskij sostav po dannym toponimiki. – Vol. II. Kety [Ancient Siberian peoples. Ethnical composition as per toponymic data]. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo universiteta, 2000. (in Russian)
Okladnikov A. P. i dr. (red.). Istorija Sibiri [History of Siberia]. – Vol. I. – L., 1968. (in Russian)
Pulleyblank E. G. Central Asia and Non-Chinese Peoples of Ancient China. Aldershot, UK and Burlington, VT, USA: Ashgate, 2002.
Pulleyblank E. G. The Consonantal System of Old Chinese // Asia Major. New series. – 1962. – Vol. 9/1-2.
Ramstedt G. J. Die Stellung des Tschuwassischen // Journal de la Sociètè Finno-Ougrienne. – 1922. – Vol. 38. – S. 1–34.
Rerih Ju. N. Istorija Srednej Azii [History of Middle Asia]. – M., 2004. – Vol. I.
Rudenko S. I. K voprosu ob istoricheskom sinteze. Po povodu odnoj diskussii. Sm. v tome: [On the issue of historic synthesis. Regarding one discussion. See in vol.:] Gumilev L. N. 1998. – P. 310–316. (in Russian)
Ruhlen M. The origin of the Na-Dene // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Anthropology. – Washington, 1998. – Vol. 95. – P. 1394–1396.
Sedlaček K. The Yeniseian Languages of the 18th Century and Ket and Sino-Tibetan Word Comparisons // Central Asiatic Journal. – 2008. – Vol. 2(52). – P. 219–305.
Shiratori K. Über die Sprache der Hiung-nu und der Tang-hu-Stämme // Bulletin de l’Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersburg, 1902. – Serie V. – Bd. XVII/2.18.
Starostin S. A. Gipoteza o geneticheskih svjazjah sinotibetskih jazykov s enisejskimi i severokavkazskimi // Drevnejshaja jazykovaja situacija v Vostochnoj Azii. [Hypothesis on genetic correlations of Sino-Tibetan languages with Yenisseic and North Caucassian] – M., 1984. (in Russian)
Taskin V. S. [sostavitel']. Materialy po istorii sjunnu (po kitajskim istochnikam). [Materials on Syunnu history (based on Chinese sourses)] – M.: Nauka, 1968. – Vol. 1. (in Russian)
Taskin V. S. [sostavitel']. Materialy po istorii sjunnu (po kitajskim istochnikam) [Materials on Syunnu history (based on Chinese sourses)]. – M.: Nauka, 1973. – Vol. 2. (in Russian)
Vajda E. J. A Siberian link with Na-Dene languages // The DeneYeniseian Connection. Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska. New Series. – 2010. – Vol. 5 (1–2). – P. 33–99.
Verner G. K. Kety kto vy? Rukopis' monografii [Kets, who are you? Handwritten thesis]. – Bonn, 2015. (in Russian)
Vovin A. Did the Xiongnu speak a Yeniseian Language? // CentralAsiatic Journal. – 44/1. – Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2000. – P. 87–104.
Vovin A. Did the Xiongnu speak a Yeniseian Language? Part 2: Vocabulary // Altaica Budapestinensia, MMII (Proceedings of the 45th Permanent International Altaistic Conference [PIAC], Budapest, Hungary, June 23-28, 2002). – 2003. P. 389–394.
Vovin A., Vajda, E., de la Vaissière E. Who were the *KJET and what language did they speak // Journal Asiatique. – 2016. – Vol. 304.1. – P. 125–144.
Werner H. Die Glaubensvorstellungen der Jenissejer aus der Sicht des Tengrismus // Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica, Bd. 73. – Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2007.
Werner H. Die Jenissejer unter den frühen Völkern Zentralasiens // LINCOM Studies in Anthropology. – München: Verlag Lincom Europa, 2014. – Vol. 19.
Werner H. Die Welt der Jenissejer im Lichte des Wortschatzes (Zur Rekonstruktion der jenissejischen Protokultur). = Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica. – Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2006. – Bd. 69.
Werner H. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen. – Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2002. – Bde 1-3.
Werner H. Zur Typologie der jenissejischen Protokultur (nach sprachlichen und mythologischen Daten) // Lincom Studies in Anthropology. – München, 2010. – Vol. 13.
Zaseckaja I. P. Kul'tura kochevnikov juzhnorusskih stepej v gunnskuju jepohu (konec IV–V cc.) [Culture of nomads of South Russian steppes in hunns period (end of IV–V c.)] V tome [in volume]: Gumilev L. N. Istorija naroda hunnu [History of Hunnu people]. –1998/2 (Sochineniя, Vol. 10). – P. 350–387. (in Russian)
Issue: 1, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 9 — 24
Downloads: 1146