KHAKASS PERIPHERAL VERBS OF VISUAL PERCEPTION AND THEIR LEXICAL CORRESPONENCES IN OTHER TURKIC LANGUAGES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2019-4-78-91
The article is devoted to the identification and description of the differential features of the semantics of peripheral verbs with the meaning of visual perception. In this subgroup, we classify seven Khakass verbs expressing various aspects of the visual act, of which four verbs have lexical correspondences in other Turkic languages. In the course of semantic-cognitive analysis of the material, the common and distinctive features of these verbs are revealed. Thus, it has been revealed that the lexical correspondences of the Khakass verbs хара- «watch closely; observe», пахла- «peep, peep» in other Turkic languages (for example, Turkish, Azeri, Tatar, Bashkir, Kazakh) have an extensive semantic structure and as a result of the development of ambiguity, they can demonstrate a weakening of the original perceptive trait in subsequent secondary values. The verb хара- / кара-, in addition to perceptual designation, indicates other spheres of human activity, for example, in the Azerbaijani, Karakalpak languages, this verb has the LSW «to obey». In the Tatar, Bashkir and other languages, this verb, due to its frequency of use, assumes the modal meaning «try». The semantic components of the verbs characteristic (according to our observations) for the Khakass language are also analyzed. In the Siberian Turkic languages, these verbs in their lexico-semantic variants (LSV) usually retain perceptual semo, only tuv.: каракта- and tof.: қарақта- show the semantic shift in terms of the cognitive relation of the visual and mental processes. According to our observations, the characteristic verses for Khakass were: хылчаңна-, хайбағын-, marked with sema «[watch], turning the head» and verb аңды-, the actualizing sign of focus and concentration of the visual act.
Keywords: khakass language, Turkic languages, verb, visual perception, meaning
References:
Garipova I. D. Slovoobrazovatel'naya determinaciya glagolov zritel'nogo vospriyatiya (na materiale russkogo i tatarskogo yazykov): 10.02.20: avtoref. … kand. filol. n. Kazan'. – 2013. – 22 s. (in Russian)
Malkina L. M. Principy organizacii leksicheskogo sostava hudozhestvennogo teksta // Edinstvo sistemnogo i funkcional'nogo analiza yazykovyh edinic: – Sb. nauch. tr. Belgorod: BelGU, 1998. – S. 153–155. (in Russian)
Moiseeva S. A. Osobennosti polisemii glagolov vospriyatiya (na materiale zapadno-romanskih yazykov) // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2008. – № 2. – S. 39–49.
Frangulis Z. S. K voprosu o klassifikacii glagolov zritel'nogo vospriyatiya // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. – 2006. – № 4 (28). – S. 116–119. (in Russian)
Chertykova M. D. Realizaciya priznaka «napravlenie vzglyada» v semantike hakasskogo glagola kör- «smotret', videt'» // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya lingvistika. Nauchnyj zhurnal (Blagoveshchensk). – 2018. – Vyp. 4, №4. – S. 145–154. (in Russian)
Chertykova M. D. «Vera» i «dostovernost'» skvoz' prizmu zritel'nogo koda (na materiale hakasskogo yazyka) // Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Ponyatie very v raznyh yazykah i kul'turah. Otv. red. chlen-korr. RAN N.D. Arutyunova, d.f.n. M. L. Kovshova. – M.: Gnozis, 2018b. – S. 189–208. (in Russian)
Yunusaliev B. M. Kirgizskaya leksikologiya. Chast' I (razvitie kornevyh slov). Frunze: Kirgizskoe gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel'stvo. – 1959. – 246 s.
Issue: 4, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 78 — 91
Downloads: 1079