ETHNOGRAPHIC CINEMA: TO THE PROBLEM OF GENRE BOUNDARIES
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2020-3-151-160
We analyze «artistic and ethnographic» (as the authors position it) of the film «Yakut Wedding. XIX century» (2016), in which creation the leading ethnographers of the republic took an active part. The film is an example of anthropological staged movie. Visualization of the folklore text (wedding ceremony), as a parade, displays the cultural codes of the ethnos, a semiotic analysis of which is proposed in order to determine the genre specificity of ethnographic cinema. The film as a visual anthropological study of folklore text offers an interpretation of the chromatic code of the Yakut culture (analysis of the semantics of white in the culture of herders). The analysis of the musical and acoustic code is carried out: the bride’s long song — reconstruction of the archaic meloform; analysis of intonation of the participants of the ritual as a speech characteristic. In addition, an analysis of the kinetic, culinary, and numerical codes of culture visualized in the film is presented. Based on the materials of festival cinema and the works of modern researchers in the field of visual anthropology, the characteristics of ethnographic cinema are generalized. Criteria are proposed, that distinguish ethnographic from other genres of documentary films. In our opinion, any representation, including a visual one made by a person about a person, is anthropological in nature. It is revealed that the genre of ethnographic cinema involves a detailed accented consideration of everyday life; search for similarities and differences of cultural texts; scientific commentary (interpretation); direction of collective perception (manipulation); creating the illusion of being here and now; the desire to convey the aura of culture as much as possible; implantation or indigenous films; "embed" the camera; «included» cinema, the achievement of naturalness; iconophobia «avoiding direct gaze»; the inclusion of the viewer in reflective activity (empathy); obligatory consonance of film aesthetics with aesthetics of culture; preference for the look of a «stranger»; «the illusion of a neutral observer». The features of the stylistics of cinematic ethnography of the Yakuts, the problems of mutual framing in multilevel and multivalent indigenous cinema are considered. It is proved that ethnographic cinema is not only a commentary on culture, and self-portrait is not an end in itself. The film is not limited to the experience of reconstruction of the rite, but it represents a mentality, is an act of self-awareness of culture.
Keywords: ethnographic cinema, folklore text, semiotic analysis, rite reconstruction, cultural codes, visual anthropology, identity
References:
Aleksandrov E. Centrostremitel`ny`j vektor v bezgranich`i vizual`noj antropologii [Centripetal vector in boundless visual anthropology]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian historical research], 2017, no. 3, pp. 11–28. (in Russian).
Aleksandrov E. Opy`t rassmotreniya teoreticheskix i metodologicheskix problem vizual`noj antropologii [Experience in the theoretical and methodological problems of visual anthropology]. Moscow, Penaty Publ. 2003. 97 p. (in Russian).
Aleksandrov E. Vizual`naya antropologiya: prioritet e`ticheskix principov [Visual antropology: priority of ethnical principles]. Nauka televideniya [The Art and Science of Television], 2019, no. 15.4, pp. 93–109. (in Russian).
Anashkin S. Interv'yu o yakutskom kino [Interview on Yakut cinema]. 2016. Available at: http://rfaf.ru/rus/library (accessed 21.02.2020). (in Russian).
Barthes R. Problema znacheniya v kino. [The problem of value in cinema]. Fashion system. Articles on semiotics of culture. Moscow. 2004. pp. 195–199. (in Russian).
Baudrillard Jean: Simulyakry i simulyacii [Simulacres et Simulation]. Moscow. 2018. 240 p. (in Russian).
Benjamin W. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epohu ego tekhnicheskoj vosproizvodimosti [Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit]. Moscow, MEDIUM Publ. 1996. 240 p. (in Russian).
Chistyakova V. O. Vizual`naya antropologiya v sisteme cultural science [Visual anthropology in the cultural science system] Vestnik Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie [RGGU bulletin. Series: Philosophy. Social studies. Art studies]. 2014, no. 14 (136), pp. 200–213. (in Russian).
Feshhenko V. V. Obrazy i roli yazyka v vizual'nom iskusstve [Images and roles of language in visual arts]. Kritika i semiotika [Critique & Semiotics], 2016, no. 2, pp. 67–82. (in Russ).
Gennep A. Obryady` perexoda [Rites of passage]. Мoscow. Eastern literature. 2002. 198 p. (in Russian).
Golovnev A. V. Antropologicheskoe kino i festival'noe dvizhenie [Anthropological cinema and festival movement]. 2013. Available at: http://rfaf.ru/rus/library (accessed 17.02.2020). (in Russian).
Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya [Anthropology of Movement]. Yekaterinburg, UrO RAN Publ. 2009. 496 p.
(in Russian).
Golovnev A. V. Kinoantropologiya [Kinoanthropology]. 2009. Available at: http://rfaf.ru/rus/library (accessed 09.02.2020). (in Russian).
Golovnev I. A. Fenomen sovetskogo e`tnograficheskogo kino [Phenomenon of the Soviet Ethnographic Cinema. Moscow. 2018. 216 p. (in Russian).
Gornykh A. A. Vizual'naya antropologiya: videt' sebya drugim [Visual anthropology: seeing oneself different]. Antropologicheskii forum [Forum for anthropology and culture], 2007, no 7, pp. 32–52. (in Russian).
Gruber M. «VklyuchennoE» ehtnograficheskoe kino: mezhkul'turnoe sotrudnichestvo v issledovaniyakh i kinoproizvodstve [«Incorporated» ethnographic cinema]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya [Siberian historical research], 2017, no. 3, pp. 49–80. (in Russian).
Heider K. Ehtnograficheskii fil'm [Ethnographic film]. Moscow, TEIS Publ. 2000. 166 p. (in Russian).
Khiozzi P. Beyond the ethnographic film? // Kul'turologicheskii zhurnal [Journal of Cultural Research]. 2012, no. 4 (10), pp. 3–13. Available at: http://cr-journal.ru (accessed 15.01.2020). (in Russian).
Khiozzi P. Vizual'naya antropologiya v Italii: proshloe i budushchee [Visual anthropology in Italy: past and future]. 16.04.2013. Available at: http://ilya-abramov-84.livejournal (accessed 17.02.2020). (in Russian).
Khristoforova O. B. Polevye metody v vizual'noi antropologii [Field methods in visual anthropology]. Fol`klor i postfol`klor: struktura, tipologiya, semiotika [Folklore and post-folklore: structure, typology, semiotics]. Moscow. 2000. Available at: https://ruthenia.ru/folklore/ hristoforova3.htm (accessed 16.02.2020) (in Russian).
Koptseva N. P., Ilbeykina M. I. Vizual'naya antropologiya kak aktual'naya oblast' kul'turnykh issledovanii [Visual anthropology as an actual field of cultural research]. Gumanitarnye i social'nye nauki [The Humanities and social sciences]. 2014, no. 2, pp. 133–155. (in Russian).
Ksenofontov G. V. Shamanizm. Yakutsk: Sever-Yug, 1992. 318 p. (in Russian).
Larionova A. S. Osobennosti ehpicheskogo peniya yakutov [Features of the epic singing of yakuts]. Yakutsk, 2005. Available at: http://textarchive.ru/c-2650498-pall.html (accessed 17.02.2020). (in Russian).
L'vova Eh. L., Oktyabr'skaya I. V., Sagalaev A. M., Usmanova M. S. Traditsionnoe mirovozzrenie tyurkov Yuzhnoi Sibiri: Prostranstvo i vremya. Veshchnyi mir [Traditional worldview of the Turks of Southern Siberia: Space and time. The real world]. Novosibirsk, Nauka. 1988. 224 p. (in Russian).
Neklyudov S. Motiv i tekst. Yazyk kul'tury: semantika i grammatika [Cultural language: semantics and grammar]. Moscow. 2004. pp. 236-247. (in Russian).
Novik E. Fol`klor — obryad — verovaniya. [Folklore — rite — beliefs]. Moscow. 1995. Available at: http://www.ruthenia.ru/folklore/novik2 (accessed 20.02.2020). (in Russian).
Oganezov A. E. Mezhdisciplinarnost` i sovmestnoe kinoproizvodstvo v antropologicheskom kino [Interdisciplinarity and co-production in anthropological cinema]. Observatoriya kul`tury` [Observatory of Cultural], 2018, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 682–692. (in Russian).
Pink S. Vizual`naya antropologiya v XXI veke [Visual anthropology in the 21st century]. Antropologicheskij forum [Forum for anthropology and culture], 2007, no. 7. pp. 68–78. (in Russian).
Razlogov K. E`. Kino — Ehtnografiya — Antropologiya [Cinema — Ethnography — Anthropology]. Filosofskie nauki [Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences], 2010, no. 7. pp. 80–90. (in Russian).
Reshetnikova A. P. Fond syuzhetny`x motivov i muzy`ka olonxo v e`tnograficheskom kontekste [Foundation of plot motifs and oloncho music]. Yakutsk: Bichik Publ. 2005. 408 p. (in Russian).
Reshetnikova A. P. K 20-letiyu Muzeya muzy`ki i fol`klora narodov Yakutii [To the 20th anniversary of the Museum of Music and Folklore of Yakutia Peoples]. Yakutsk: Kompaniya «Dani Almas» Publ. 2011. 144 p. (in Russian).
Rubi Dzh. Vizual'naya antropologiya [Visual anthropology]. Vizual'naya antropologiya: novye vzglyady na sotsial'nuyu real'nost': Sb. nauch. st. [Visual anthropology: new perspectives on social reality]. Saratov. 2007. pp. 398–412. (in Russian).
Slepczov P. A. Traditsionnaya sem'ya i obryadnost' u yakutov (XIX-nachalo XX veka) [Traditional family and ritualism in the Yakuts (19th — early 20th century)]. Yakutsk: Yakutskoe knizhnoe izdatel`stvo. 1989. 158 p. (in Russian).
Toporov V. N. O chislovykh modelyakh v arkhaichnykh tekstakh [About numerical models in archaic texts]. Struktura teksta [Text structure]. Moscow. 1980. pp. 3–58. (in Russian).
Trushkina E. Yu. Antropologiya vizual'noi kommunikatsii: istoriya i metodologiya [Anthropology of visual communication: History and methodology]. Chelovek i kul`tura [Human and culture]. 2014, no. 6, pp. 29–43. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library (accessed 10.01.2020). (in Russian).
Utexin I. V. K istorii antropologicheskogo vzglyada na vizual'nost'. Recenziya [To the history of the anthropological view of visuality. Review]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New literature review]. 2013, no. 24. Available at: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines (accessed 12.01.2020). (in Russian).
Vasil'ev F. Voennoe delo yakutov [Military science of the Yakuts]. Yakutsk. 1995. 224 p. (in Russian).
Xrenov N. A. 10 let nauchnomu al'manakhu «Traditsionnaya kul'tura»: Posleslovie [10 years of scientific almanac «Traditional сulture»: Afterword.] Tradicionnaya kul`tura [Traditional culture]. 2010, no. 2 (38), pp. 11–20. (in Russian).
( 694.07 kB ) 
( 643.32 kB )
Issue: 3, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY
Pages: 151 — 160
Downloads: 1646