INTERROGATIVE SPEECH ACTS AS RELICT MANIFESTATION OF SHAMANIC PRACTICE IN MONUMENTS OF PRIESTLY CULT (ON DATA OF THE RIGVEDA AND SIBERIAN SHAMANISM)
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2020-4-18-29
The subject of the study is interrogative speech acts which appear to be one of the markers of the shamanic ritualism. The research work was carried out on the linguistic data of the Rigveda genetically traced to the times of Proto-Indo-European unity and in the range of traits typologically relevant to the Eurasian shamanism. The author raises the issue if the questions presented in the monuments of developed priestly cult refer to the shamanic verbal practice. The achievement of the outlined objective was provided by solving such research problems as description and analysis of different types of interrogative speech acts of the Rigveda, revealing their communicative intentions in the context of hymns and ritual practice. In the paper the functional analysis of interrogative speech acts is productively complemented with appealing to approaches and data of such scientific disciplines as communication studies, pragmalinguistics, history, ethnography, folklore and religion studies. In addition to the descriptive method as well as the contextual analysis and the statistical technology the author makes use of comparative analysis of the published ceremonial material of shamanism. Historical and genetic analysis of the text of the Rigveda also finds its application in the study. The author elicits that both in shamanic activity and in the Vedic hymns questions fulfil general functions of communication: message, interaction and impact. The paper demonstrates that apart from nonspecific pragmatic the questions in ceremonial practice objectivate the magical and invocatory speech function. Light is thrown upon the genesis and functions of questions of the cosmogonic hymns.
Keywords: pragmatics, speech act, interrogation, illocution, communicative intention, shaman-ism, the Rigveda
References:
Baranov A. N., Kreydlin G. E. Illokutivnoe vynuzhdenie v structure dialoga [Illocutionary force the structure of dialogue] // Topics in the study of languages. 1992. No. 2. Pp. 84–99. (in Russian).
Vasilevich G. M. Drevnie okhotnich’i i olenevodcheskie obryady evenkov [Ancient hunters’ and reindeer herders’ ceremonies of the Evenkis] // Cbornik muzeya antropologii i etnografii AN SSSR [Collection of Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of Academy of Sciences of the USSR]. Vol. 17. 1957. Pp. 151–185. (in Russian).
Voronkina M. A. Illokutivnaya funktsiya voprosov v gimne «Rigvedy» bravavrttam [Illocutionary Force of Questions in Hymn of “Rigveda” Bravavrttam] // Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 4. Pp. 32–37. (in Russian).
Elizarenkova T. Ya. Vediiyskiy yazyk [The Vedic language]. M., 1987. (in Russian).
Elizarenkova T. Ya. Yazyk i stil’ vediiskih rishi [Language and style of the Vedic rsis]. M., 1993. (in Russian).
Elizarenkova T. Ya., Toporov V. N. O vediyskoy zagadke tipa Brahmodya [On Vedic puzzle kind of brahmodya] // Paremiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Paroemiological Researches]. M., 1984. Pp. 14–46. (in Russian).
Zaporozhchenko A. V. Elementy shamanizma v indoiranskoy etnokul’turnoy traditsii [Elements of shamanism in Indo-Iranian ethnocultural tradition]. Abstract of Hist. Cand. Diss. Omsk, 2002. (in Russian).
Kalinina A. A. Voprositel’nye predlozheniya kak tekstoobrazuyuschee sredstvo (na primere publitsisticheskogo teksta-rassuzhdenia) [Interrogative sentences as a text-forming means (on the example of public text-discussion)] // Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture. 2019. No 2. Pp. 82–86. (in Russian).
Lévi-Strauss C. Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural anthropology] = Anthropologie structurale. M., 2001. (in Russian).
Mikhalskaya A. K. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya ritorika [Comparative-historical rhetoric]. M., 2019. (in Russian).
Moroz E. L. Sledy shamanskih predstavlenii v epicheskoy traditsii Drevney Rusi [Remains of shamanic concepts
in the epical tradition of Ancient Russia] // Fol’klor i etnografia. Svyazi fol’klora s drevnimi predstavleniyami i obryadami [Folklore and ethnography. Links of folklore with ancient concepts and ceremonies]. L., 1977. Pp. 64–73. (in Russian).
Novik E. S. Obryad i folklor v sibirskom shamanizme: Opyt sopostavleniya struktur [Ceremony and folklore in Siberian shamanism. Experience of comparison of structures]. M., 2004. (in Russian).
Poeziya i proza Drevnego Vostoka. [Ancient East Poetry and Prose]. M., 1973. (in Russian).
Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki. [Historical roots of fairy tale]. M., 2001. (in Russian).
Rigveda: [In 3 vols.] / transl. by T. Ya. Elizarenkova. M., 1989–1999. (in Russian).
Toporov V. N. O kosmologicheskih istochnikah ranneistoricheskih opisanii [On the cosmological sources of early historical descriptions] // Trudy po znakovym sistemam, 6 [Works on sign systems, 6]. Tartu, 1973. Pp. 106–150. (in Russian).
Upanishady [Upanishads] / trans. from Sanskrit by A. Ya. Syrkin. M., 2000. (in Russian).
Shchutskii Yu. K. Kitaiskaya klassicheskaya «Kniga peremen» [Chinese Classical «Book of changes» (Yi Ching)]. M., 1997. (in Russian).
Basham A. L. The Wonder that was India. L.: Picador, 2004.
Brown W. N. India and Indology. New-Delhi, 1978.
Eliade M. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton, 2004.
Frankfort H., Frankfort H. A., Wilson J. A., Jacobsen T. Before philosophy. The intellectual adventure of ancient man. Chicago, 1946.
Kuiper F. B. J. Selected writings on Indian linguistics and philology. Amsterdam, 1997.
Oppenheim A. L. Ancient Mesopotamia: portrait of a dead civilization. Chicago, London, 1977.
Searle J. Speech Acts // Syntax and Semantics. 1976. Vol. 3.
The Rig Veda in Sanskrit. URL: https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rvsan/ (accessed 11.10.2019).
The Veda of the Black Yajur School Entitled Taittiriya Sanhita / transl. by A. B. Keith. Delhi, Varanasi, Pathna, 1914.
( 958.45 kB ) 
( 874.05 kB )
Issue: 4, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 18 — 29
Downloads: 608