QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TONAL SYSTEMS: TONAL DENSITY INDEX
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2022-1-33-45
Tonal languages may differ considerably with respect to the functional load of the tone. Carlos Gussenhoven suggested the notion of tonal density of a language, however, to our knowledge, there have been no attempts to apply it in practice. In this paper, a method of calculation of the Tonal Density Index (TDI) is proposed. Under TDI we understand the ratio of the number of tonemes or marked tones to the number of segmental units in a text. The key notions related to the TDI are the following: — toneme i.e. a tonal contour which is relevant for the expression of a lexical or grammatical meaning; — tonal domain, i.e. a sequence of segments to which a toneme is associated; — marked tone, which is often postulated in languages with two-level tonal systems. In such languages, syllables or morae which do not carry the marked tone can be considered toneless; — a basic segmental unit may be a syllable or a mora. Consequently, two kinds of TDI can be calculated, the “moraic TDI” and the “syllabic TDI”. The key question is the applicability of segmentation into these units. Some languages distinguish up to four degrees of the syllable weight; sometimes syllables of identical structures are interpreted differently in what concerns their syllabic weight, even in closely related languages; such factors may considerably complicate the count of moras. On the other hand, in other languages, identification of syllables may be problematic; in such languages, the “moraic TDI” would be easier to calculate. Three languages of different types have been taken to exemplify the method of calculation of the “syllabic TDI”. In Navajo (Southern Athabascan group, USA), a language with a marked high tone, the TDI equals 35.8. In Bambara (Western Mande, Mali), a two-level language with tonal domains, the TDI equals 70. In Eastern Dan (South Mande group, Côte d’Ivoire), a language with 5 level tones, the TDI equals 105.8.
Keywords: tonal density, toneme, tonal domain, marked tone, syllable, mora
References:
Gordon, Matthew J. 2017. Syllable weight: A typological and theoretical overview. In Syllable weight in African languages, 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Griscom, Richard & Doris Payne. 2017. Non-uniform syllable weight in Southern Kenyan Maa (Maasai). In Paul Newman (ed.), Syllable weight in African languages, 143–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press.
Gussenhoven, Carlos, N.J. Smelser & Paul B. Baletes. 2001. Suprasegmentals. International Encyclopedia of the Social and the Behavioural Sciences. Oxford.
Hale, Ken & Lorraine Honie. n.d. An introduction to the sound sysytem of Navajo. Part one: Articulatory phonetics. MIT.
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: the case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31. 213–238.
Hyman, Larry M. 2011a. Tone: Is it different? In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 197–239. 2nd edn. Blackwell.
Hyman, Larry M. 2011b. Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: What’s so great about being universal? Phonology 28. 55–85.
Kasevich, Vadim B. 1983. Fonologicheskije problemy obschego I vostochnogo jazykoznanija [Phonological topics in the general and oriental linguistics]. Moscow: Nauka. Glavnaja redaktsija vostochnoj literatury.
McDonough, Joyce M. 1999. Tone in Navajo. Anthropological linguistics 41(4). 503–540.
McLaughlin, Fiona & Caroline Wiltshire. 2017. Syllable weight in the phonology of Pulaar. In Paul Newman (ed.), Syllable weight in African languages, 161–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pike, Kenneth Lee. 1948. Tone Languages: A Technique for Determining the Number and Type of Pitch Contrasts. Language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion (University of Michigan Publications. Linguistics 4). Ann Arbor.
Roberts, David, Ginger Boyd, Johannes Merz & Valentin Vydrine. 2020. Quantifying written ambiguities in tone languages: a comparative study of Elip, Mbelime and Eastern Dan. Language Documentation and Conservation 14. 108–138.
Sapir, Edward & Harry Hoijer. 1967. The phonology and morphology of the Navajo language (University of California Publications in Linguistics 4). Berkeley: University of California.
Vydrin, Valentin. 2016. Tonal inflection in Mande languages: The cases of Bamana and Dan-Gwɛɛtaa. In Enrique L. Palancar & Jean Léo Léonard (eds.), Tone and Inflection: New facts and new perspectives (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 296), 83–105. De Gruyter — Mouton.
Vydrin, Valentin. 2017a. Bamana jazyk [Bamana language]. In Valentin Vydrine, Yulia Mazurova, Andrej Kibrik & Elena Markus (eds.), Jazyki mira: Jazyki mande [Languages of the world: Mande languages], 46–143. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Historia.
Vydrin, Valentin. 2017b. Dan jazyk [Dan language]. In Valentin Vydrin, Yulia Mazurova, Andrej Kibrik & Elena Markus (eds.), Jazyki mira: Jazyki mande [Languages of the world: Mande languages], 469–583. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Historia.
Vydrin, Valentin. 2020a. Vowel elision and reduction in Bambara. Italian Journal of Linguistics 32(1). 103–124. https://doi.org/10.26346/1120-2726-150.
Vydrin, Valentin. 2020b. Featural foot in Bambara. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 41(2). 265–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2020-2012.
Yazzie, Evangeline P. & Margaret Speas. 2007. Diné bizaad bínáhoóaah. An introduction to the Navajo language. Flagstaff, AZ: Salina Bookshelf.
Yip, Moira. 2007. Tone. In The Cambridge Handbook on Phonology, 229–251. Cambridge University Press. Paul de Lancy.
( 1013.96 kB ) 
( 915.98 kB )
Issue: 1, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 33 — 45
Downloads: 407