PARTICIPIAL CONSTRUCTIONS WITH THE MEANING OF SIMULTANEITY IN THE KAZYM KHANTY
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2022-4-59-72
The article deals with participial temporal constructions with the meaning of simultaneity in the Kazym dialect of Northern Khanty. The richness and variety of the inventory of these constructions have been documented in a number of works. However, the existing descriptions do not clearly show their functioning and distribution. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the semantics of simultaneity constructions in more detail and to identify their characteristic features. Data for the study were collected during a field study in the village of Kazym in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Russia, by asking native speakers to complete stimulus contexts, the first part of which consisted of a dependent clause of each construction with a varying predicate. The questionnaire was based on a sample of 50 verbs of different aspect classes. Five constructions were selected for the study: one casemarked participle (locative case) and four postpositional participial constructions with the postpositions pŏrajən, măr(ən), kŭtən, and saxət/sati/sa. The constructions were analyzed based on three aspectual parameters: Telicity, duration, and homogeneity of events. It was found that none of the constructions, with the exception of the locative construction, is compatible with telic background events. In this regard, the pŏrajən construction favors longterm background events, the kŭtən construction heterogeneous background events, the saxət/sati/sa construction short or medium-length background events and telic main events. A closer examination of the received contexts revealed that the pŏrajən construction is not semantically unspecified as described in the literature but expresses a specific meaning of simultaneity with an event that characterizes a period of time. The kŭtən construction, in turn, postulates a heterogeneous background through an initially heterogeneous event, while in combination with homogeneous events, it implies a deliberate interruption of the background event by the subject. The măr(ən) and kŭtən constructions have virtually no restrictions in combination with short-term events, but they are appropriate only in the case of “stretching” these events in time or simultaneity on a smaller scale.
Keywords: Uralic languages, Khanty, semantics, aspect, taxis, participle, polypredication, simultaneity
References:
Apresjan Ju. D. Jazykovaja kartina mira i sistemnaja leksikografija [Linguistic worldview and systemic lexicography] / Ju. D. Apresjan (ed.). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskih kul'tur, 2006.
Koshkareva N. B. Poslelogi hantyjskogo jazyka (na materiale kazymskogo dialekta) [Postpositions in Khanty (data from Kazym Khanty)] // N. A. Luk'janova (ed.). Jazykovye edinicy v semanticheskom i leksikograficheskom aspektah. Novosibirsk, 1996. P. 45–61.
Koshkareva N. B. Vremennye sinteticheskie polipredikativnye konstrukcii s infinitnymi formami glagola v forme mestno-tvoritel'nogo padezha v surgutskom dialekte hantyjskogo jazyka (v sopostavlenii so smezhnymi hantyjskimi i neneckimi dialektami) [Temporal synthetic complex sentences with non-finite verb forms in locative case in Surgut Khanty (in comparison to adjacent Khanty and Nenets dialects)] // Sibirskij filologicheskij zhurnal. 2007. No 3. P. 158–173 (in Russian).
Lel'hova F. M. Glagol'no-imennye poslelozhnye slovosochetanija, vyrazhajushhie vremennye otnoshenija v hantyjskom jazyke [Verb-noun compounds denoting temporal relations in Khanty] // Vestnik ugrovedenija. 2012. No 3 (10). P. 46–51 (in Russian)
Tatevosov S. G. Akcional'nost': tipologija i teorija [Actionality: typology and theory] // Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2005. No 1. P. 108–141 (in Russian).
Cheremisina M. I., Koshkareva N. B. Slozhnoe i oslozhnennoe predlozhenie v hantyjskom jazyke [Complex sentence in Khanty] // Jazyki narodov Sibiri: Grammaticheskie issledovanija. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991. P. 740–804.
Dowty D. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language. 1991. No 67. P. 546–619.
Janda L. A. Russian aspectual types: Croft’s typology revised. In M. Shrager (ed.). Studies in Slavic Linguistics and Accentology in Honor of Ronald F. Feldstein. Bloomingtom: Slavica Publishers. 2015. P. 147–167.
Kortmann B. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. In J. Van der Auwera, D. P. Baoill, D. Ó. Baoill (eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Walter de Gruyter, 1998. P. 457–561.
Schön, Zs. Postpositionale Konstruktionen in chantischen Dialekten. München: Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2017.
Talmy L. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society. Vol. 1. 1975. P. 419–430.
Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press, 2000.
( 251.49 kB ) 
( 208.85 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 59 — 72
Downloads: 403