ABOUT THE CHARACTER OF THE BASHKIR MYTHOLOGY AZHDAHA
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2022-4-84-94
In order to reveal the image of the Bashkir mythological figure Azhdaha, we compare him with similar figuresin neighboring and other peoples and try to identify the roots of his appearance in the region. We show and describetwo images of the Bashkir Azhdaha – a fairy-tale, dragon-like appearance and a mythological, serpent-likeappearance. The study is based on the authors’ field material, information from Bashkir folklore, and comparativematerial on Turkic-speaking and Iranian peoples. Azhdaha is known among the Bashkirs in two images: in the epicsand fairy tales, he is represented as a multi-headed dragon, and in various religious beliefs, he is a mythologizedserpent that has reached enormous proportions after a hundred-year life. The presence of many similar featuresamong other peoples of Eurasia suggests that his image evolved in the general Eurasian channel. The dragonitself is a later mythological figure, which is a further development of the image of the serpent, which had an ambivalentcharacter in the representations. Among the Bashkirs, both images – the serpent and the dragon – werecalled by the same name – azhdaha, which has an Iranian etymology and goes back to the Avestic mythology.At the same time, both are negative figures associated with the element of water. Azhdaha, from different beliefs,represents a long-lived serpent, in our opinion, reflecting the transformation of a serpent, which originally hadno clear negative character, into a negative character that harms people. The development of the fabulous and epicazhdaha took place separately, and its image is generally closely associated with the literary tradition of the East.His image is less uniform – he may be many-headed and have the ability to fly, breathe fire, and guard a watersource, or a treasure, mountains appear in the place of his slain body. Close to the first serpent/dragon from thelegends, which are preserved only in records from the XIX – early XX centuries. He was a huge serpent whoserestlessness forced the local population to change their residence.
Keywords: azhdaha, dragon, serpent, mythological character, Bashkirs
References:
Avesta. Izbrannye gimny iz Videvdata [Avesta. Selected hymns from Videvdat] / per. s avest. I. Steblina-Kamenskogo. M., 1993.
Aminev Z. G. Epos «Ural batyr» kak kosmogonicheskiy mif (K probleme doislamskogo mirovozzreniya bashkir) [The epos "Ural Batyr" as a cosmogonic myth (On the problem of the pre-Islamic worldview of the Bashkirs)]. Ufa, 2007.
Akhmerov R. B. Naskal'nye znaki i etnonimy Bashkir [Rock signs and ethnonyms of Bashkirs]. Ufa, 1994.
Basilov V. N. Azhdarkha. Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya [Azhdarkha // Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia. Electronic edition]. Elektronnoe izdanie. Pod red. S. A. Tokareva. M., 2008. P. 40. URL: https://www.indostan.ru/ biblioteka/knigi/2730/3412_1_o.pdf (accessed: 14.09.2021).
Bashkirskoe narodnoe tvorchestvo. Vol. 2. Predaniya i legendy [Bashkir folk art. Vol. 2. Stories and legends]. Ufa, 1987.
Bashkirskoe narodnoe tvorchestvo. Vol. 3. Bogatyrskie skazki [Bashkir folk art. Vol.3. Heroic tales]. Ufa, 1988.
Berezkin Yu. E., Duvakin E. N. Tematicheskaya klassifikatsiya i raspredelenie fol'klorno-mifologicheskikh motivov po arealam. Analiticheskiy catalog [Thematic classification and distribution of folklore and mythological motifs by area]. Syuzhet I76A. URL: http://newstar.rinet.ru/kozmin/berezkin/146-43.html (accessed: 23.03.2021).
Ber-Glinka A. I. Zmeya kak seksual'nyy i brachnyy partner cheloveka (Eshche raz o semantike obraza zmei v fol'klornoy traditsii evropeyskikh narodov) [The snake as a sexual and mating partner of a person (once again about the semantics of the image of the snake in the folklore tradition of European peoples)] // Kul'turnye vzaimodeystviya. Dinamika i smysly. Sbornik statey v chest' 60-letiya I. V. Manzury. Kishinev, 2016.
Ber-Glinka A. I. Syuzhetnyy tip ATU411 v skazochnoy traditsii Evrazii: nekotorye zamechaniya k “tipologicheskomu ukazatelyu skazochnykh syuzhetov” G.-Y. Utera. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2018. No 4. P. 171–184. (in Russian).
Braginskiy I. S. Zakhhak [Zahhak] // Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya. Elektronnoe izdanie . Pod red. S. A. Tokareva. M., 2008. 382 p. URL: https://www.indostan.ru/biblioteka/knigi/2730/3412_1_o.pdf (accessed: 14.09.2021). (in Russian).
Vasil'ev L. S. Kul'ty, religii, traditsii v Kitae [Cults, religions, traditions in China]. 2-e izd. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 2001. 488 p. (in Russian).
Vasil'tsov K. S. Svyashchennye gory i svyashchennye kamni: legendy ob musul'manskikh avliya v Badakhshane [Sacred Mountains and Sacred Stones: Legends of Muslim Awliya in Badakhshan] // Pax Islamica. 2013. No 1 (10). P. 123–137. (in Russian).
Vakhitov R. Epokha Zmeya v Uralo-Povolzh'e [Epoch of the Serpent in the Ural-Volga region] // Vatandash. 2016. No 11. P. 97–115 (in Russian).
Galyautdinov I. G. «Tarikhnama-i Bulgar» Tazhetdina Yalsygula [«Tarikhnama-i Bulgar]. 2-e pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe izdanie. Ufa, 1998 (in Russian).
Garustovich G. N. Kto nauchil zmeya letat'? K voprosu o proyavlenii mifologicheskikh printsipov v totemizme Bashkir [Who taught the snake to fly? On the question of the manifestation of mythological principles in Bashkir totemism] // Zolotoordynskaya tsivilizatsiya. 2014. P. 140–160 (in Russian).
El'nikov M. V. Obraz drakona-zmiya na ser'gakh zolotoordynskogo perioda: kul'turno-khronologicheskiy aspect [The image of a dragon-serpent on earrings of the Golden Horde period: a cultural and chronological aspect] // Stratum plus. Kul'turnaya antropologiya i arkheologiya. 2009. No 6. Prichernomorskie etyudy. P. 410–420 (in Russian).
Ivanov V. V. Drakon [Dragon] // Mify narodov mira. Entsiklopediya. Elektronnoe izdanie. Pod red. S. A. Tokareva. M., 2008. pp. 326–327. URL: https://www.indostan.ru/biblioteka/knigi/2730/3412_1_o.pdf (accessed: 14.09.2021).
Ivanova V. V. Zmeya-dzhinn-predok: anatoliyskiy vzglyad na khranitelya doma [The Genie-ancestor Snake: an Anatolian view of the Keeper of the House] // Aziatskiy bestiariy. Obrazy zhivotnykh v traditsiyakh Yuzhnoy, Yugo-Zapadnoy i Tsentral'noy Azii / red. M. A. Rodionova. SPb.: MAE RAN, 2009. P. 151–160.
Ilimbetova A. F. Simvolika azhdakhi v fol'klore i verovaniyakh Bashkir [The snake is the personification of fire, sun and stars in the folklore traditions of the Bashkirs] // Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2021. No 2. P. 87–94 (In Russian).
Koblov Ya. D. Mifologiya kazanskikh tatar [Mythology of the Kazan Tatars]. Kazan', 1910.
Kudryashev P. M. Predrassudki i sueveriya bashkirtsev [Superstitions and superstitions of the Bashkirs] // Bashkiriya v russkoy literature. Vol. 1. Ufa: Bashknigoizdat, 1961 (in Russian).
Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki [The historical roots of the fairy tale]. M., 2000. 335 p.
Pugachenkova G. A. Mechet' Anau [Anau Mosque]. Ashkhabad, 1959. 90 s.
Reshetov A. M. Drakon v kul'turnoy traditsii kitaytsev. Material'naya kul'tura i mifologiya [The dragon in the Chinese cultural tradition] // Sb. MAE. Vol. XXXVII. L., 1981. P. 81–92. (in Russian).
Rudenko K. A. Kazanskiy drakon: obraz i simvol [Kazan dragon: image and symbol] // TA. No 1–2 (14–15). Kazan' i Kazanskoe khanstvo. Kazan', 2005.
Rudenko S. I. Bashkiry. Istoriko-etnograficheskie ocherki [Bashkirs. Historical and ethnographic essays]. Ufa, 2006.
Snesarev G. P. Pod nebom Khorezma (etnograficheskie ocherki) [Under the sky of Khorezm (ethnographic essays)]. M., 1973.
Stebleva I. V. Ocherki turetskoy mifologii: Po materialam volshebnoy skazki [Essays on Turkish Mythology: Based on the materials of a fairy tale]. M.: Vost. lit., 2002. 102 p.
Syzranov A. V. Drakony, goroda i «stroitel'nye zhertvy»: ob astrakhansko-kazanskikh fol'klornykh parallelyakh [Dragons, cities and "construction sacrifices": about Astrakhan-Kazan folklore parallels] // Astrakhanskie kraevedcheskie chteniya: sbornik statey. Astrakhan', 2010. Vol. II. P. 301–304.
Sychev L. P., Sychev V. L. Kitayskiy kostyum. Simvolika. Istoriya. Traktovka v literature i iskusstve [Chinese costume. Symbolism. History. Interpretation in literature and art]. M., 1975. 172 p.
Tan Venchan. Istoki proiskhozhdeniya obraza kitayskogo drakona [The origins of the image of the Chinese dragon] // Kul'tura. Nauka. Tvorchestvo. Vol. 11. Minsk, 2017. P. 522–526 (in Russian).
Terletskiy N. S. Kollektsiya № 6935; sobiratel' R. R. Rakhimov (obrazy fantasticheskikh zhivotnykh v tsentral'noaziatskoy keramike) [Collection No. 6935; collector R. R. Rakhimov (images of fantastic animals in Central Asian ceramics)] // Rakhmat-name: Sbornik statey k 70-letiyu R. R. Rakhimova. SPb., 2008. P. 348–380.
Ural-batyr [Ural-batyr]. Ufa, 2005.
Filonenko V. M. Bashkiry (okonchanie) [Bashkirs] // Vestnik Orenburgskogo uchebnogo okruga. Ufa, 1914. P. 191–192. (in Russian).
Khadyeva R. N. Bashkirskaya etnokul'tura i yazyk. Opyt vossozdaniya yazykovoy kartiny mira [Bashkir ethnoculture and language. The experience of recreating the linguistic picture of the world]. Ufa, 2005.
Khamidullin S. I. Burdzhany v istorii Evrazii [Burjans in the history of Eurasia]. Ufa: Gilem, 2013.
Khisamitdinova F. G. Slovar' bashkirskoy mifologii [Dictionary of Bashkir mythology].Ufa, 2019. 432 p.
Khudyakov M. G. Ocherki po istorii Kazanskogo khanstva [Essays on the history of the Kazan Khanate]. M., 1991.
Һamar, Һarytau ulkaһe bashkorttarynyn rukhi khazinaһy [Spiritual heritage of the Bashkirs of the Samara and Saratov regions]. Өfө, 2008. 284 p. (in Bashkir).
Shamusarov Sharustam. Fol'klornye svyazi tyurkskikh narodov Tsentral'noy Azii i sredneaziatskikh arabov [Folklore connections of the Turkic peoples of Central Asia and the Central Asian Arabs] // Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost'. 2009. No 1. pp. 63–75 (in Russian).
Eyvel'mans Bernar. Velikiy morskoy zmey [Great sea serpent]. Per. N. N Nepomnyashchiy (URL: http://www.librams.ru/ reading-13281.html (accessed: 5.02.2021)).
Yuluev B. G. Azhdakha – zmey v rasskazakh Bashkir // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 1892. No 2–3. P. 245–248 (in Russian).
( 201.3 kB ) 
( 169.97 kB )
Issue: 4, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY
Pages: 84 — 94
Downloads: 453