Structural and Semantic Analysis of Common and Generalized Food Names in the Selkup Language
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2023-4-45-54
The article presents a comprehensive study of the vocabulary of common and generalized food names in the Selkup language, which has not yet been the subject of a linguistic description. The study made it possible to identify and systematize common or generalized food names, clarify the period of their formation, carry out a morphosyntactic analysis of the lexemes, examine their word formation activity, determine the capacity for semantic derivation, determine the internal form of complex and compound lexical units, to identify common and generalized food names and their derivatives, to analyze sentence expressions with the component denoting a common and generalized food name, to carry out a contextual analysis of common and generalized food names on the material of household texts. The author used research methods such as descriptive analysis, comparative historical analysis, component analysis, and quantitative analysis. Selkup language dictionaries served as sources for the Selkup language. The work of leading linguists on the etymology, phonetics, and grammar of the Selkup language enabled us to carry out a comprehensive analysis. As a result of the research carried out, it was found that the common and generalized names of food in the Selkup language go back to the verb stem *ǝm- ‘to eat’ from the common Samoyed period of formation. Twenty-six dialect variants of common and generalized food names were identified in the modern Selkup language. They have different morphosyntactic structures: simple non-derivatives (10), simple derivatives (14), and compound names (2). The lexemes studied have a polysemy based on metonymic transference. Nouns (9) and compound names (13) are also formed from the stem *ǝm- ‘eat,’ which denotes objects and phenomena directly or indirectly related to food. Most nouns are represented by simple derived lexemes (7), but one complex word and one word formed by transformation have been identified. Compound names can be bipartite (11) or tripartite (2), consisting of an adjective or adverb and a noun.
Keywords: food names, Selkup language, structural and semantic analysis, vocabulary of traditional foods, indigenous language
References:
Bekker E. G., Alitkina L. A., Bykonya V. V., Ilyashenko I. A. Morfologiya sel’kupskogo yazyka. Yuzhnyje dialekty [Morphology of the Selkup language. Southern dialects]: v 2 ch. Ed. E. G. Bekker. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo TGPU, 1995a. Part 1. 292 p. (in Russian).
Bekker E. G., Alitkina L. A., Bykonya V. V., Ilyashenko I. A. Morfologiya sel’kupskogo yazyka. Yuzhnyje dialekty [Morphology of the Selkup language. Southern dialects]: in 2 ch. Ed. E. G. Bekker. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo TGPU, 1995b. Part 2. 284 p. (in Russian).
Bykonya V. V. Proishozhdenije sredstv vyrazhenija kategorii otritsaniya v sel’kupskom yazyke [The origin of the means of expressing the category of negation in the Selkup language]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2014. No. 4 (145). Pp. 61–66 (in Russian).
Bykonya V. V. Sel’kupy: yazyk i kul’tura (etnolingvisticheskij ocherk) [Selkups: language and culture (ethnolinguistic essay)]: monographiya. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo TGPU, 2011. 236 p. (in Russian).
Dmitrieva S. V. Leksika tematicheskoj gruppy “Pitanije” v narodnoj rechi v areal’nom aspekte: na materiale pskovskikh govorov [Vocabulary of the thematic group "Nutrition" in folk speech in the areal aspect: on the material of Pskov dialects]: dis. kand. filol. nauk. Pskov, 1999. 269 p. (in Russian).
Lagmetova F. B. Nazvanija traditsyonnoj pishchi v gutumskom dialekte lezginskogo yazyka [Names of traditional food in the Gutum dialect of the Lezgian language]: dis. kand. filol. nauk. Makhachkala, 2011. 183 p. (in Russian).
Karaseva T. V. Nazvanija pishchi v voronezhskikh govorakh: etnolingvisticheskij aspekt [Food names in Voronezh dialects: ethnolinguistic aspect]: dis. kand. filol. nauk. Voronezh, 2004. 492 p. (in Russian).
Kazakevich O. A. , Kuznetsova A. I., Khelimsky E. A. Ocherki po sel’kupskopmu yazyku. Tazovskij dialekt [Essays on the Selkup language. Taz dialect]: v 3 t. Ed. E. A. Kuznetsova. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo MGU, 2002. Vol. 3. 220 p. (in Russian).
Kim A. A. Ocherki po sel’kupskoj kul’tovoj leksike [Essays on the Selkup ceremonial vocabulary]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo NTL, 1997. 219 p. (in Russian).
Kozyreva Z. G. Istoriya nazvanij produktov pitaniya i pishchi v ukrainskom yazyke [The history of food and food names in the Ukrainian language]: dis. kand. filol. nauk. Kiev, 1984. 254 p. (in Russian).
Kosterkina N. T., Momde A. Ch., Zhdanova T. Yu., Gusev V. Yu. Slovar’ nganasansko-russkij i russko-nganasanskij [Nganasan-Russian and Russian-Nganasan dictionary]. St. Petersburg, Prosveshchenie, 2001. 415 p. (in Russian).
Kuznetsova A. I., Khelimsky E. A., Grushkina E. V. Ocherki po sel’kupskopmu yazyku. Tazovskij dialekt [Essays on the Selkup language. Taz dialect]: v 3 t. Ed. V. A. Zvegintseva. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1980. Vol. 1. 408 p. (in Russian).
Malozemlina O. V. Leksika pishchi v govorakh kamchadalov [The vocabulary of food in the dialects of the Kamchadals]: dis. kand. filol. nauk. Yaroslavl, 2009. 283 p. (in Russian).
Napolskikh V. V. Proiskhozhdenije nazvanij pishchi v sel’kupskom i ugorskikh yazikakh [The origin of salt names in the Selkup and Ugric languages]. Izvestia Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Gumanitarnyje nauki. 2020. Vol. 22. No. 4 (202). P. 48–61 (in Russian).
Persidskaya A. S. Structurno-semanticheskije osobennosti somaticheskoj leksiki v indigennoj lingvokul’ture [Structural and semantic features of somatic vocabulary in indigenous linguoculture]: dis. kand. filol. nauk. Tomsk, 2022. 233 p. (in Russian).
Polyakova N. V. Verbalization of the concept of “land” in Selkup and Russian [Verbalizatsiya contsepta “zemlya” v sel’kupskom i russkom yazykhakh]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2011. Vol. 9 (11). P. 134–138.
Pyrerka A. P., Tereshchenko N. M. Russko-nenetskij slovar’ [Russian-Nenets dictionary]. Ed. I. I. Meshchaninov. Moscow, OGIZ, 1948. 405 p. (in Russian).
Sateeva E. V. Osnovoobrazujushchie suffiksy imeny sushchestvitel’nogo v sel’kupskom yazyke [The basic suffixes of the noun in the Selkup language]: abstr. dis. kand. filol. nauk. Tomsk, 2006. 26 p. (in Russian).
Sel’kupsko-russkij dialektnyj slovar’ [Selkup-Russian dialect dictionary]. Ed. Prof. V. V. Bykonya. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo TGPU, 2005. 348 p. (in Russian).
Sekrety sel’kupskoj edy [Secrets of Selkup food]. Department of culture of Parabelsky district administration of the Tomsk region; compiled by A. G. Tuchkov; translation of the text into the Chumylkup dialect of the Selkup language by I. A. Korobeynikova; scientific ed. by L. I. Sherstova. Tomsk: Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2021. 96 p. (in Russian).
Stepanova O. B. Pishcha v mifologicheskikh predstavleniyakh sel’kupov [Food in the mythological representations of the Selkups]. Tomskiy zurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovanij. 2022. No. 2 (36). P. 149–159 (in Russian).
Stepanova O. B. Traditsionnaya pishcha severnykh sel’kupov i formirovanije novoj etnichnosti [The traditional food of the northern Selkups and the formation of a new ethnicity]. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. No. 3. P. 121–130 (in Russian).
Sorokina I. P., Bolina D. S. Slovar’ enetsko-russkij i russko-enetskij [Enets-Russian and Russian-Enets dictionary]: posobije dlya uchashcikhsya nachal’noj shkoly. St. Petersburg, Prosveshchenie, 2001. 311 p. (in Russian).
Alatalo J. Sölkupisсhes Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne, 2004. 465 p.
Dulson A. Über die räumliche Gliederung des Sölkupischen in ihrem Verhältnis zu den alten Volkstumsgruppen. SFU, 1971. P. 35–43.
Janhunen J. Samojedischer Wortschatz (Gemeinsamojedische Etymologien). Helsinki, 1977. 186 p.
( 177.35 kB ) 
( 167.3 kB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 45 — 54
Downloads: 199