Bilingualism in the Urban Linguistic Landscape (Using the Example of Petrozavodsk)
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2024-3-18-31
Interdisciplinary studies of urban linguistic landscapes, which have recently shown considerable dynamics, are among the most actively developing areas of modern humanitarian knowledge. The main task of the research is to describe linguistic landscapes in the context of general issues of multilingual communicative practices, ethnic identity, and language policy. The methodology for studying visual ethnic information represented in urban spaces is constantly evolving. This article attempts to describe the modern bilingual landscape of Petrozavodsk. The Karelian language only began to appear on the city’s streets relatively recently, when the city administration began installing bilingual street signs in Russian and Karelian in 2021. The objectives of this study included not only describing the formation of the modern linguistic landscape in a diachronic way but also analyzing the peculiarities of the naming process of toponyms in Karelian. To this end, the study involved interviews with experts (translators and linguists) who created street signs in Karelian. During the interview, the basic principles of toponym selection were clarified. An equally important task of the work was to find out the opinion of Karelian residents about the use of street signs and façade signs in Karelian in the city. A sociolinguistic questionnaire was developed to carry out the survey. The survey results, in which 60 informants took part, show that the inhabitants of the city and the entire republic have a positive attitude towards the visualization of the Karelian language and the majority believe that it should be expanded. The positive attitude of the informants is directly related to the symbolic function of Karelian language elements in the linguistic landscape. A separate block of questions in the questionnaire aimed to clarify the symbolic area. The analysis of the material has shown that the written represen tations of the Karelian language in the urban space are not related to the possibility of linguistic commodification but to the symbolic dimension of the linguistic landscape – ethnic identity, preservation, and popularization of the Karelian language and its national and cultural value.
Keywords: linguistic landscape, the Karelian language, sociolinguistics, multilingualism, identity, survey
References:
1. Pavlenko A. Yazykovye landshafty i drugie sociolingvisticheskie metody issledovaniya russkogo yazyka za rubezhom [Linguistic landscapes and other sociolinguistic methods for studying the Russian language abroad]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Lingvistika – Bulletin of the Russian Peoples’ Friendship University. Series: Linguistics, 2017, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 493–514 (in Russian).
2. Landry R., Bourhis R. Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: an empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1997, no. 16 (1), pp. 25–29.
3. Proekt Federal’noy Programmy po sokhraneniyu i razvitiyu yazykov Rossii. 09.11.2022 [Draft Federal Program for the Preservation and Development of Russian Languages. 09.11.2022]. URL: https://iling-ran.ru/languages_of_russia/federal’naja_programma_soxranenija_jazykov_2022.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2024) (in Russian).
4. Proekt Koncepcii yazykovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federacii. 16.07.2021 [Draft Concept of the Language Policy of the Russian Federation. 16.07.2021]. URL: https://iling-ran.ru/languages_of_russia/koncepcija_jazykovoj_politiki.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2024) (in Russian).
5. Vinkler M. A., Pavlova O. M. Rossiyskie praktiki sokhraneniya, vozrozhdeniya i razvitiya yazykov [Russian practices of preserving, reviving and developing languages]. In: Itogovye dokumenty, podgotovlennye v khode nauchno-issledovatel’skoy raboty «Razrabotka plana i metodik sokhraneniya i vozrozhdeniya yazykov Rossii» [Final documents prepared during the research work “Development of a plan and methods for preserving and reviving the languages of Russia”], 2021. URL: https://iling-ran.ru/languages _of_russia/2021_stage1/doc3.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2024) (in Russian).
6. Ivanov V. V. Metodiki izmeneniya obshhestvennogo soznaniya v oblasti yazykovogo mnogoobraziya i povysheniya prestizha yazykov Rossii [Methods for changing public consciousness in the field of linguistic diversity and increasing the prestige of Russian languages]. Itogovye dokumenty, podgotovlennye v khode nauchno-issledovatel’skoy raboty «Razrabotka plana i metodik sokhraneniya i vozrozhdeniya yazykov Rossii» [Final documents prepared during the research work “Development of a plan and methods for preserving and reviving the languages of Russia”], 2021. URL: https://iling-ran.ru/languages_of_russia/2022_stage2/Report-2022_1.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2024) (in Russian).
7. Saduov R. T. My slushaem gorod: o metodakh raboty s gorodskim narrativom [We listen to the city: about methods of working with urban narrative]. In: Kul’turno-yazykovoy landshaft: na perekrestke issledovatel’skikh paradigm [Cultural and linguistic landscape: at the crossroads of research paradigms.]. Ufa: RIC BashGU Publ., 2021. Pp. 208–219 (in Russian).
8. Extra G. Mapping linguistic diversity in multicultural contexts: Demolinguistic perspectives. In: Fishman J., Garcia O. (eds.). Handbook of language and ethnic identity. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. Pp. 107–122.
9. Degteva Zh. F. Kartografirovanie yetnokul’turnykh landshaftov korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa Yakutii [Mapping the ethnocultural landscapes of indigenous peoples of the North of Yakutia]. Geograficheskaya sreda i zhivye sistemy – Geographic environment and living systems, 2023, no. 2, pp. 154–169 (in Russian).
10. Malinowski D., Maxim H., Dubreil S. (eds.). Language Teaching in the Linguistic Landscape. Mobilizing Pedagogy in Public Space. Springer Cham. 371 p.
11. Manchurina L., Samsonova M. Representation of Languages in the Linguistic Landscape of the City of Yakutsk. Sibirica, 2022, vol. 21 (3), pp. 128–158.
12. Esenova T. S. Yazykovoy oblik goroda Yelisty [Linguistic appearance of the city of Elista]. In: Esenova T. S. (ed.) Russkiy yazyk v inoyazychnom okruzhenii: sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy razvitiya, kul’turnorechevye problemy: materialy Rossiyskoy nauchnoy konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Russian language in a foreign language environment: current state, development prospects, cultural and speech problems: materials of the Russian scientific conference with international participation]. Yelista: Dzhangar, 2016. Pp. 41–55 (in Russian).
13. Baranova V., Fedorova K. (Ne)vidimost’ i (vne)nakhodimost’: trudovye migranty i yazykovoy landshaft Sankt-Peterburga [(In)visibility and (non)existence: labor migrants and the St.Peterburg linguistic landscape]. Gorodskie issledovanija i praktiki – Urban Research and Practice, 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 103–121 (in Russian).
14. Baranova V., Fedorova K. Regulirovanie yazykovogo landshafta v rossyjskikh gorodakh: mnogoyazychie i neravenstvo [Regulating the linguistic landscape in Russian cities: multilingualism and inequality]. Zhurnal issledovaniy social’noy politiki – Journal of Social Policy Research, 2020, no. 18 (4), pp. 625–640 (in Russian).
15. Saduov, R. T., Varukha, I. V., Ganeeva, E. R., Timerbaeva, E. I. Multilingualism and identity in the visual space: linguistic landscape in the urban periphery. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, no. 15 (11), pp. 1637–1654.
16. Razumov R. V., Gorjaev S. O. Translyaciya regional’noy identichnosti v urbanonimii rossiyskikh gorodov: sovremennoe sostoyanie [Translation of regional identity in the urbanonymy of Russian cities: current state]. Voprosy onomastiki – Questions of onomastics, 2020, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 201–219 (in Russian).
17. Golomidova M. V. Municipal’naya toponimicheskaya politika i voprosy razvitiya gorodskoy toponimii [Municipal toponymic policy and issues of development of urban toponymy]. Sociolingvistika – Sociolinguistics, 2022, no. 3 (11), pp. 41–53 (in Russian).
18. Cokolova T. P. Kommodifikaciya toponimii sovremennoy Moskvy v sociolingvisticheskom aspekte [Commodification of the toponymy of modern Moscow in the sociolinguistic aspect]. Sociolingvistika – Sociolinguistics, 2022, no. 3 (11), pp. 9–26 (in Russian).
19. Voloshina S. V. Kul’turno-yazykovoy landshaft sovremennoy sibirskoy derevni kak rezul’tat vzaimodeystviya kul’tur (na primere d. Berjozovka Pervomajskogo rajona Tomskoj oblasti) [The cultural and linguistic landscape of a modern Siberian village as a result of the interaction of cultures (using the example of the village of Berezovka, Pervomaisky district, Tomsk region)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2022, no. 79, pp. 21–39 (in Russian).
20. Mullonen I. I., Zaharova E. V. Problemy integracii pribaltiysko-finskikh toponimov v oficial’noe russkoe upotreblenie [Problems of integration of Baltic-Finnish place names into official Russian use]. Etnolingvistika. Onomastika. Etimologiya: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Ethnolinguistics. Onomastics. Etymology: materials of the international scientific conference]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publ., 2019. Pp. 222–225 (in Russian).
21. Elagina A. A., Ryzhkov A. M. Karel’skiy yazyk v yazykovom landshafte Karelii i konstruirovanie lokal’nykh prostranstv [Karelian language in the linguistic landscape of Karelia and the construction of local spaces]. Al’manakh severoevropeyskikh i baltiyskikh issledovaniy – Almanac of Northern European and Baltic Studies, 2022, no. 7, pp. 241–248 (in Russian).
22. Ilyukha O. Predislovie [Preface]. In: Finskiy faktor v istorii i kul’ture Karelii XX veka [The Finnish factor in the history and culture of Karelia of the 20th century]. Petrozavodsk: KarNC RAN Publ., 2009. Pp. 3–13 (in Russian).
( 1.42 MB ) 
( 1.39 MB )
Issue: 3, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 18 — 31
Downloads: 195