The Image of the Snake in Bashkir Toponymy
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2024-4-23-30
Geographical names with the word ‘snake’ are common in Bashkir toponymy. This article aims to uncover the reasons for using such names and to shed light on their origins. The occurrence of snakes in certain habitats is the most important factor influencing the appearance of these names. River names associated with the image of a snake have a visual connection to the movements and appearance of a snake that can be observed. The image of a crawling or slithering snake reflects the popular perception of the flow of a river. Furthermore, the inclusion of snake imagery in toponymy can be traced back to ancient Bashkir beliefs and mythology, in which snakes play an important role. An analysis of the mythological material shows that the snake symbolizes the feminine principle, life, fertility, and bodies of water such as rivers and lakes. Consequently, ‘snake’ names are predominantly associated with bodies of water, with these geographical features being viewed both positively and negatively in the popular consciousness. Therefore, distinguishing between sacred and negative places in Bashkir toponymy is possible. According to Bashkir mythology, the snake, as a totem animal, serves as a guide through infinite space and can locate drinking water sources. As the snake is the totem of the Bashkir clan Yylan, it is reflected above all in Bashkir ethnohydronymy, especially in relation to sacred places. In Bashkir mythology, the snake stands for both life and death, which means that bodies of water named after it are associated with “negative” places. Derogatory names in Bashkir hydronyms are associated with symbols from Iranian mythology, such as Azhdaha, Azhi, and Azhai, which stand for dragons or monsters. These creatures are believed to inhabit lakes and swamps, making the water unsuitable for drinking. For this reason, these objects are classified as “negative” places in Bashkir toponymy.
Keywords: toponymy, Bashkir toponymy, snake image, reclamation toponyms, pejorative toponyms
References:
1. Tenishev E. R. et al. (eds) Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya grammatika tyurkskikh yazykov. Leksika [Comparative-historical grammar of the Turkic languages. Lexicon]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1997. 800 p. (in Russian).
2. Kovalevskiy A. P. Kniga Akhmeda Ibn-Fadlana o ego puteshestvii na Volgu v 921–922 g. [Book of Ahmed Ibn-Fadlan about his journey to the Volga in 921–922]. Kharkov: Kharkov State University Publ., 1956. 348 p. (in Russian).
3. Ilimbetova A. F., Akhmadiev F. V. Totemisticheskiy prazdnik zmei v miforitual’noy traditsii bashkir [Totemistic holiday of the snake in the mythological and ritual tradition of the Bashkirs]. Problemy vostokovedeniya – Problems of Oriental Studies, 2021, no. 1 (91), pp. 48–54 (in Russian).
4. Bukharova G. Kh. Bukharova G. Kh. Imena mificheskikh pervopredkov v onomasticheskom prostranstve bashkirskogo eposa «Ural-batyr» [Names of mythical ancestors in the onomastic space of the Bashkir epic “Ural Batyr”]. Fol’klor i fol’kloristika XXI v.: Aktual’nyye napravleniya i perspektivy issledovatel’skikh praktik sbornik materialov II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Collection of materials from the II International Scientific and Practical Conference “Folklore and Folklore Studies of the 21st Century: Current Directions and Prospects for Research Practices”]. Ufa, 2023. pp. 56–64. (in Russian).
5. Ilimbetova A. F. O kul’te zmei u bashkir [About the Snake Cult at the Bashkirs]. Belskie prostory – Belskie Expanses, 1999, no. 11 (in Russian).
6. Ural batyr. Bashҡort halyҡ ҡobajyry = Ural-batyr. Bashkirskiy narodniy epos [Ural-batur. Bashkort Folk Epic]. Ufa: In-formreklama Publ., 2005. 468 р. (in Bashkir and Russian).
7. Toporov V. N. Zhivotnye [Animals]. In: Tokarev S. A. (ed.) Mify narodov mira [Myths of the Peoples of the World]. Mos-cow: Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1992, vol. 2. pp. 440–449 (in Russian).
8. Levy-Stross K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie [Primordial Thinking]. Moscow: Republic Publ., 1994. pp. 239–263 (in Russian).
9. Khan V. S. Struktura praktiki i sposob myshleniya epokhi pervobytnoy rodovoy obshchiny [Structure of Practice and Method of Thinking of the Epoch of the Primordial Tribal Community]. MSU Bulletin, Philosophy, 1993, no. 1. pp. 83–91 (in Russian).
10. Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe [The Sacred in the Secular World]. Moscow: Publishing house Moscow University, 1994. 144 p. (in Russian).
11. Braginskiy I. S. Zakhak [Zahhak]. In: Tokarev S. A. (ed.) Mify narodov mira [Myths of the world nations]. Moscow: So-viet Encyclopedia Publ., 1991. Vol. 1, pp. 462–463 (in Russian).
12. Rastorguyeva V. S., Edel’man D. I. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ iranskikh yazykov [Etymological Dictionary of Iranian Languages]. Moscow: Eastern Literature Publishing Company, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2000. Vol. 1. pp. 50 (in Russian).
13. Chunakova O. M. Pekhleviyskiy slovar’ zoroastriyskikh terminov, mificheskikh personazhey i mifologicheskikh simvolov [Pahlavi dictionary of Zoroastrian terms, mythical characters and mythological symbols]. Saint Petersburg: Institute of Oriental Studies; Moscow: Eastern literature Publ., 2004. 286 p. (in Russian).
14. Braginsky I. S. Azhi [Aji]. In: Tokarev S. A. (ed.) Mify narodov mira [Myths of the world nations]. Moscow: Soviet En-cyclopedia Publ., 1991. Vol. 1, pp. 5 (in Russian).
15. Akhmetyanov R. D. Obshchaya leksika dukhovnoy kul’tury narodov Srednego Povolzh’ya [General vocabulary of spiritual culture of Middle Volga Region peoples]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1981. 144 p. (in Russian).
( 179.3 kB ) 
( 152.69 kB )
Issue: 4, 2024
Series of issue: Issue № 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 23 — 30
Downloads: 2