System of Approximative Markers in Sakha

Winkler Maria Alexandrovna

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2024-4-31-46

Information About Author:

Maria E. Winkler, Junior researcher Research Center for the Preservation, Revitalization and Documentation of the Languages of Russia, Institute of linguistics RAS. Bolshoy Kislovsky lane, 1, bld. 1, Moscow, Russia, 125009. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Leninskiye Gory, 1, Moscow, Russia, 119991. E-mail: mw@iling-ran.ru

The article considers data from Sakha that marks an approximate quantity in numerical constructions. The article describes a system of such markers. First, I analyze the available data from published sources and represent the inventory of markers in Sakha. In particular, I have described the marker igin (игин), for which there is no data both in the grammatical descriptions known to me and in the dictionaries. I have refined the data on the other approximate quantity markers in comparison with the literature. I also described the surface morphosyntax of such constructions (linear position in a quantified expression, in particular, the ability to occur between the elements of a complex quantifier). The investigation revealed two different strategies of word order in numerical constructions. Second, I analyzed the contexts with other classes of numerals and some syntactic categories beyond quantified expressions with cardinal numerals. As this part of my investigation has shown, imprecise quantity markers in Sakha are incompatible with ordinal numerals (except for igin). The morphosyntactic properties of an approximative quantity marker хас (xas) have also been described. These properties distinguish it from other operators that mark an approximate quantity. Third, I examined the cross-category properties of the markers in question. It was shown that the markers kurduk (курдук), saɣa (саҕа), and keriŋe (кэриҥэ) can function as equatives (marking the standard of comparison). In this usage, saɣa and keriŋe are also restricted to quantitative contexts, while the distribution of kurduk is much broader. It has been shown that kurduk acquires an epistemic modal function in combination with non-finite verbal forms. The corresponding data were analyzed in terms of scales and pragmatic halos resulting from the framework presented in [Lasersohn 1999]. Finally, it was shown that different types of scales are available for the approximate markers analyzed in this paper.

Keywords: Sakha, quantified expressions, comparative constructions, numerals, approximation, equatives, scales

References:

1. Lasersohn P. Pragmatic halos. Language, 1999, no. 75 (3), pp. 522–551.

2. Treis Y. Comparative Constructions: An Introduction. In: Treis Y., Wojtylak K. I. On the expression of comparison: Contributions to the typology of comparative constructions from lesser-known languages. Linguistic Discovery, 2018, no. 16(1), pp. 1–36.

3. Treis Y., Vanhove M. (eds) Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2017. 437 p.

4. Haspelmath M. Equative constructions in world-wide perspective: A crosslinguistic perspective. In: Treis Y., Vanhove M. (eds) Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2017. pp. 9–32.

5. Haspelmath M., Buchholz O. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In: van der Auwera J. (ed.) Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1998. pp. 277–334.

6. SakhaTyla.ru. Russko-yakutskiy i yakutsko-russkiy elektronniy slovar' [Russian-Sakha and Sakha-Russian onine dictionary]. Available at: http://sakhatyla.ru.

7. Korkina E. I., Ubryatova E. I., Xaritonov L. N., Petrov N. E. (eds) Grammatika sovremennogo yakutskogo literaturnogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [Grammar of the modern Sakha literary language. Phonetics and morphology]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1982. 504 p. (in Russian).

8. Ubryatova E. I. Issledovaniya po sintaksisu yakutskogo yazyka: Slozhnoe predlozhenie [Research on the syntax of Sakha language: Complex sentence]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1976. Book 2, vol. 2. 681 p. (in Russian).

9. Shcherbak A. M. Ocherki po sravnitel'noy morfologii tyurkskikh yazykov (imya) [Essays on the comparative morphology of Turkic languages (Noun)]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1977. 190 p. (in Russian).

10. Starostin S., Dybo A., Mudrak O. An Etymological Dictionary of Altaic Languages. Leiden: Brill, 2003. Part I–III. 2096 p.

11. Etimologicheskaya baza dannykh, sostavlennaya S. A. Starostinym [An etymological database by S. A. Strarostin]. Available at: www.starling.rinet.ru.

12. Ubryatova E. I., Petrov N. E., Neustroev N. N. et al. Grammatika sovremennogo yakutskogo literaturnogo yazyka [Grammar of the modern Sakha literary language]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1995. Vol. 2. 336 p. (in Russian).

13. Ubryatova E. I. Yazyk noril'skikh dolgan [Language of the Norilsk Dolgans]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1985. 216 p. (in Russian).

14. Ivanov S. A. (2012). O sledakh ischeznuvshikh v yakutskom yazyke padezhey [On traces of cases that have disappeared in Sakha]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2012, no. 5 (259), pp. 63–67 (in Russian).

15. Vasil'ev Yu. I. Sposoby vyrazheniya sravneniya v yakutskom yazyke [Ways of expressing comparison in Sakha]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1986. 109 p. (in Russian).

16. Winkler M.-E. A. Approksimativnye kolichestvennye konstrukcii finno-ugorskix yazykov v tipologicheskoj perspektive Magisterskaya dissertaciya. [Approximative quantified expressions in Finno-Ugric and typology. Master's thesis]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ., 2020. 119 p. (in Russian).

17. Plank F. How to disclaim precision about numbers. Leipzig Numerals Workshop, 29–30 March 2004 (handout).

18. Ionova A. A., Lyutikova E. A. Sfera deystviya ad”ektivnykh operatorov i sintaksis imennoy gruppy v russkom yazyke [The scope of adjectival operators and the syntax of noun phrases in Russian]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M. A. Sholoxova. Seriya Filologicheskie nauki – Bulletin of the Moscow State Humanitarian University named after M.A. Sholokhov. Series Philological Sciences, 2015, no. 2, pp. 68–87 (in Russian).

19. Sleeman R. The second best word order: How ordinals restrict superlatives and why it’s not reciprocated (presentation). 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Leipzig, 21st–24th August 2019.

20. van der Auwera J., Plungian V. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 1998, no. 2 (1), pp. 79–124.

21. Anderson C. Inherent and coerced gradability across categories: manipulating pragmatic halos with sorta. Proceed ings of the 23rd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, held at the University of California, Santa Cruz, May 3–5, 2013. pp. 81–96.

( 224.27 kB ) ( 215.23 kB )

Issue: 4, 2024

Series of issue: Issue № 4

Rubric: LINGUISTICS

Pages: 31 — 46

Downloads: 61