Visual Folkloristics: From Video Recording to Complex Research
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2024-4-143-152
The article is dedicated to the methodological problems of visual folkloristics. The article justifies the necessity of its separation into a sub-discipline of visual anthropology and classical folklore studies. According to the author, the language of cinema is the semiotic system capable of capturing such a complex cultural phenomenon as a folkloristic work as completely, adequately, and accurately as possible. The importance of the non-verbal and extra-musical aspects of the performance, which are lost in text or audio recordings, is emphasized. The article is based on the field material collected by the author during folkloristic-ethnographic expeditions in different regions of Siberia. Examples are given of video recordings of such complex rituals as the Bear Festival and the honoring of family patron spirits among the Khanty, shamanic initiation among the Buryats, and the Altai calendar ritual Jazhyl bӱr (‘Green Leaves’). Practical recommendations are given for the choice of this or that recording method in different situations. The relevance of recording rituals with two cameras and the continuous recording method is justified. The problem of subsequent editing of the filmed material – various editing options depending on the task and target audience and the analysis of the existing video material from the point of view of various scientific disciplines (ethnography, linguistics, folklore, musicology, choreography) is considered separately. The author believes that the joint viewing of folklore videos with informants can serve as a “catalyst” for the creative activity of performers and can be used for this purpose in field research. The end result of a visual folklorist’s work can be a folklore film, a multimedia disk, a database stored online, illustrations for articles and academic reports, and educational materials for school and university students. Another issue is the copyright of the video material, which should be clarified at least through a verbal agreement with the informant, respecting all his wishes regarding confidential information. The author concludes that only integrated digital video and audio recordings can provide the necessary level of completeness and adequacy to capture such a multidimensional phenomenon as folklore and that audiovisual folklore has already developed its own tasks and methods to solve them, moving from the level of recording the performance of a folkloristic work to the level of its complex interdisciplinary study.
Keywords: visual anthropology, visual folkloristics, ritual folklore, video recording, methodology, video editing, authenticity
References:
1. Luman N. Neveroyatnost' kommunikatsii [The improbability of communication]. In: Boronoev A. O. (ed.) Problemy teoreticheskoy sotsiologii [Problems of theoretical sociology]. Saint Petersburg: SPbSU Publ., 2000. Vol. 3. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/2972 (accessed: 19.07.2024) (in Russian).
2. Zemtsovskiy I. I. Predstavlenie o tselostnosti fol'klornogo zhanra kak ob"ekt rekonstruktsii i kak metod [Representation of the integrity of folklore genre as an object of reconstruction and as a method]. In: Putilov B. N. (ed.) Fol'klor i etnografiya. Problemy rekonstruktsii faktov traditsionnoy kul'tury [Folklore and ethnography. Problems of reconstruction of traditional culture facts]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1990. 233 р. (in Russian).
3. Britsina A. Yu. Tsifrovye tekhnologii i problema autentichnosti zapisi prozy: «sploshnaya» fiksatsiya i kontekst ispolneniya [Digital technologies and the problem of authentic prose recording: 'solid' fixation and performance contexts]. In: Klyaus V. L., Minenok E. V. (eds) Mul'timediynye i tsifrovye tekhnologii v sobiranii, sokhranenii i izuchenii fol'klora [Multimedia and digital technologies in the collection, preservation and study of folklore]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., 2012. pp. 22–29 (in Russian).
4. Aleksandrov E. V. Opyt rassmotreniya teoreticheskikh i metodologicheskikh problem vizual'noy antropologii [Experience in considering theoretical and methodological problems of visual anthropology]. Moscow: MSU Publ., 1999. 99 p. (in Russian).
5. Klyaus V. L. Audiovizual'naya fol'kloristika: istoriya i problematika [Audiovisual folkloristics: history and problematics]. Novye rossiyskie gumanitarnye issledovaniya – New Russian Humanities Research, 2019, no. 14, pp. 139 (in Russian).
6. Gatsak V. M. Predislovie [Preface]. In: Klyaus V. L., Minenok E. V. (eds) Mul'timediynye i tsifrovye tekhnologii v sobiranii, sokhranenii i izuchenii fol'klora [Multimedia and digital technologies in the collection, preservation and study of folklore]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., 2012. pp. 6–7 (in Russian).
7. Forum: Vizual'naya antropologiya [Forum: Visual Anthropology]. Antropologicheskiy forum – Anthropology Forum, 2007, no. 7, pp. 6–108 (in Russian).
8. Klyaus V. L., Voronkov S. O., Semenov A. A. Proekt sozdaniya «Ekspeditsionnogo mul'timediynogo programmnogo kompleksa» [The project of creation of «Expedition multimedia software complex»]. In: Klyaus V. L., Minenok E. V. (eds) Mul'timediynye i tsifrovye tekhnologii v sobiranii, sokhranenii i izuchenii fol'klora [Multimedia and digital technologies in the collection, preservation and study of folklore]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., 2012. pp. 84–94 (in Russian).
9. Vovchak A. S., Dobryanskaya L. A. L'vovskie elektronnye arkhivy ukrainskogo fol'klora [Lviv electronic archives of Ukrainian folklore]. In: Klyaus V. L., Minenok E. V. (eds) Mul'timediynye i tsifrovye tekhnologii v sobiranii, sokhranenii i izuchenii fol'klora [Multimedia and digital technologies in the collection, preservation and study of folklore]. Moscow: IMLI RAN Publ., 2012. pp. 38–46 (in Russian).
10. Pauells L. Reprezentiruya dvizhushchiesya kul'tury: problemy i vozmozhnosti antropologicheskoy i sotsiologicheskoy refleksii [Representing Moving Cultures: Challenges and Opportunities anthropological and sociological reflection]. In: Yarskaya-Smirnova E., Romanov P. (eds) Vizual'naya antropologiya: nastroyka optiki [Visual Anthropology: Adjusting the Optics]. Moscow: Variant Publ., TsSPGI Publ., 2009. pp. 126–149 (in Russian).
11. Mis'kova E. V. Fol'klor i kino. Problema posrednichestva v etnograficheskom dialoge [Folklore and Cinema. The Problem of Mediation in Ethnographic Dialogue]. In: Pivneva E. A., Funk D. A. (eds) V poiskakh sebya: Narody Severa i Sibiri v postsovetskikh transformatsiyakh [In Search of Self: Peoples of the North and Siberia in Post-Soviet Transformations]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2005. pp. 108–155 (in Russian).
12. Alekseev E. E. Fol'klor v kontekste sovremennoy kul'tury [Folklore in the context of modern culture]. Мoscow: Sov. kompozitor Publ., 1988. 236 p. (in Russian).
13. Hoppál M. Ethnographic Films on Shamanism. In: Siikala A. L., Hoppál M. (eds) Studies of Shamanism. Helsinki–Budapest: Finnish Anthropological Society – Akademiai Kiado Publ., 1992. pp. 182–196.
14. Aronson O. V. Kino: sobytie dokumenta [Cinema: the event of the document]. URL: https://flahertiana.ru/program/events.htm?id=169. (accessed: 19.07.2024) (in Russian).
15. Danilko E. S. Problemy videofiksatsii obryadov zemledel'cheskogo kalendarya v fil'me «Uchuk» [Problems of video fixation of rites of the agricultural calendar in the movie «Uchuk»]. In: Gatsak V. M., Vladykina T. G. (eds) Russkiy sever i vostochnye finno-ugry: problemy prostranstvenno-vremennogo fol'klornogo dialoga [Russian North and Eastern Finno-Ugrians: Problems of Spatial-Temporal Folklore Dialogue]. Izhevsk: Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature, Ural Branch of the RAS Publ., 2006. pp. 244–246. (in Russian).
16. Antropova N. A., Klyaus V. L. Zagovorno-zaklinatel'nye obryady udmurtskoy znakharki sela Bagyr v videofiksatsii [Proverbial and inflammatory phenomena of the Udmurt charmer of the village of Bagyr in video-fiction] In: Gatsak V. M., Vladykina T. G. (eds) Russkiy sever i vostochnye finno-ugry: problemy prostranstvenno-vremennogo fol'klornogo dialoga [Russian North and Eastern Finno-Ugrians: Problems of Spatial-Temporal Folklore Dialogue]. Izhevsk: Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature, Ural Branch of the RAS Publ., 2006. pp. 246–275 (in Russian).
17. Sychenko G. B., Leonova N. V., Michkov P. A. Elektronnye formy opisaniya i problemy sozdaniya bazy dannykh muzykal'no-fol'klornogo arkhiva [Electronic forms of description and problems of creating a database of music and folklore archive] In: Klyaus V. L., Minenok E. V. (eds) Mul'timediynye i tsifrovye tekhnologii v sobiranii, sokhranenii i izuchenii fol'klora [Multimedia and digital technologies in the collection, preservation and study of folklore]. Moscow: IMLI RAS Publ., 2012. pp. 148–155 (in Russian).
( 174.15 kB ) 
( 147.42 kB )
Issue: 4, 2024
Series of issue: Issue № 4
Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY
Pages: 143 — 152
Downloads: 2