LING TSPU
  • RU
  • EN
Today: 23.01.2021
Home Archive 2013 Year Issue №1 TOPONYMIC MODELS OF PLACENAME FORMATION IN SELKUP
  • Home
  • Archive
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Submit paper
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance

Journal TSPU

vestnik.tspu.edu.ru
praxema.tspu.edu.ru
ling.tspu.edu.ru
npo.tspu.edu.ru

EBSCO

Яндекс.Метрика
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

TOPONYMIC MODELS OF PLACENAME FORMATION IN SELKUP

Tuchkova N. A.

Information About Author:

The paper discusses the types of toponym formation of Selkup settlements of southern and central dialectal groups of Selkup. The analysis is based on more than 200 stationary Selkup settlements (yurts) which were found in the area of the Middle Ob in the second half of XIX – early XX centuries. The information about Selkup names of settlements was obtained from the publications of A. F. Plotnikov (1901), S. K. Patkanov (1911), V. Nagnibeda (1927), C. Papae (1952; the data collected in 1888), E. G. Becker (1965), as well as geographical maps of the period and unpublished sources: the data from church parish registers and the field notes of the author. Four major types of toponymic models of place-name formation and the areas of their distribution are defined. Two main toponymic areas approximately coincide with the boundaries of settlements of chumylkup (common formants -kynak, -nak, karamo) and syussykum (-kanet / -gayet, -dabu, -anga). For the area of the chumylkups it was found that the place names of the river basins of the Kenga (namely, upper and middle), the Chizhapka (lower and middle) and the Tym (upper and lower) are particularly similar in structure. Along the Ob there can be found areas with the attested suffix -n, and the adjective suffixes -l/l’ (in chumylkup) and -j (in the area of the southern dialects). In addition, the microarea identified with the suffix -sa / -tsa (without added nomenclature terms ed or et 'settlement') was outlined – the area along the Ob (between the mouths of the Parabel and the Tym). The identification of toponymic areas will allow researchers to speak more convincingly about the migration of various Selkup groups within their domesticated territory, and will provide the opportunity to draw ethnohistorical conclusions about the process of the development of the Middle Ob.

Keywords: Selkup, Middle Ob, local groups, stationary settlements, settlement names, types of toponym formation, arуфы of distribution of toponymic models

touchkova_n_a_97_116_1_1_2013.pdf ( 569.24 kB ) touchkova_n_a_97_116_1_1_2013.zip ( 554.51 kB )

Issue: 1, 2013

Series of issue: Issue № 1

Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY

Pages: 97 — 116

Downloads: 877

© 2021 Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU