COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIMINUTIVE DERIVATION MODELS IN THE SERBIAN AND CROATIAN LANGUAGES (BASED ON FEMININE NOUNS)
Present study concentrates on the distribution of feminine diminutive nominal suffixes in Serbian and Croatian. Both languages possess a dominant system with one prepotent suffix (-ica), whose combinability is (morphonologically) not restrained. All the constraints on the combinability of the suffix which functioned on the previous stages of language development (and are still in effect in closely related languages) are eliminated. The rival suffix -ka has almost been lost in its diminutive meaning and functions as a hypocoristic suffix. The main distinction of the two systems lies in the operation of the archaic suffix -ca. While Serbian has preserved the suffix in its main function (diminutivization of the former i-stems), Croatian has almost lost it: suffix -ca does not function as a diminutive suffix in Croatian.
Keywords: Serbian language, Croatian language, South Slavonic languages, derivation, diminutivation, morphology
References:
Anić V. Rječnik hrvatskoga jezika (3rd ed) [Dictionary of Croatian]. – Zagreb, 1998. (in Croatian)
Anić V., Silić J. Pravopis hrvatskoga jezika [Spellin dictionary of Croatian]. – Zagreb, 2001. (in Croatian)
Anić V., Matasović R., Pranjković I., Brozović Rončević D., Goldstein I., Goldstein S., Jojić L., Cikota L. Hrvatski enciklopedijski rječnik [Encyclopedic dictionary of Croatian]. – Zagreb, 2004. (in Croatian)
Bošković R., Yolkina N. M., Tolstoy N. I. Osnovy sravnitel'noj grammatiki slavjanskih jazykov: fonetika i slovoobrazovanie [The basic principles of comparative grammar of Slavonic languages: phonetics and derivation]. – Moscow: Higher School publ., 1984. (in Russian)
Itkin I. B. Ob odnom ogranichenii na sochetaemost' suffiksov s osnovoj v sovremennom russkom jazyke [On one constraint on the combinability of suffixes and stems in the Russian language] // Slavic Studies. – 2005. – Issue 4. – Р. 50–57 (in Russian)
Jаниħ А. Kriteriјumi za identifikaciјu leksikalizovanih deminutiva u srpskome јeziku [Criteria of identification of lexicalized diminutives in the Serbian Language] // Yearbook of the Serbian language. – 2012. – Vol. XXV/12. – P. 79–88 (in Serbian)
Ljubešić N., Klubička F. {bs,hr,sr}WaC – Web corpora of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian // Proceedings of the 9th Web as Corpus Workshop (WaC-9). – 2014. – P. 29–35.
Manova S. Derivation versus inflection in three inflecting languages // Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. 2005. – Series 4. – P. 233–252.
Milenova M. Diminutive Suffixes in Bulgarian. // Patras Working Papers in Linguistics. – 2009. – № 1. – P. 127–147.
Spasovski L. Morphology and Pragmatics of the Diminutive: Evidence from Macedonian. Diss. Arizona State University, 2012.
Tagabileva M. G. Diminutivnye sushhestvitel'nye zhenskogo roda v makedonskom jazyke [Feminine nominal diminutives in the Macedonian language] // Bulletin of the Sholom Aleykhem State University of the Amur Region. – 2015. – Issue 3. – Р. 56–68 (in Russian)
Williams M. S. Diminutivity in Bulgarian: a formal and semantic study. Diss. University of Chicago, Department of Slavic Languages and Literature, 1996.
( 719.26 kB ) 
( 706.9 kB )
Issue: 3, 2016
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 33 — 38
Downloads: 431